Superschlenz
Superschlenz t1_jedlxfn wrote
Reply to Question about school by SnaxFax-was-taken
>At home learning would be much more efficient rather than traditional school.
If you are no longer forcing the poor children with the rich children to be together in the same classroom, the need to watch everything on Netflix would be gone for the poor and the number of pirated copy downloads would decrease.
Superschlenz t1_je84822 wrote
Reply to comment by BigMemeKing in The argument that a computer can't really "understand" things is stupid and completely irrelevant. by hey__bert
>Why does 2+2=4?
Because someone defined the digit symbols and their order to be 1 2 3 4 5
. If they had defined đ 2 § Π Ø
instead, then 2+2=Π
.
Superschlenz t1_je7znzd wrote
Reply to comment by Neurogence in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
She had only one video with the topic AI at https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fbFUaM1p2l8 for the 2005 "Robots" movie, I don't think her signature is authentic. She is still on stage today, but Sarah Connor is not her real name. Maybe another Sarah Connor has signed the letter.
Superschlenz t1_jdtc3xa wrote
Reply to Story Compass of AI in Pop Culture by roomjosh
I cannot find the good https://imdb.com/title/tt0358082/ in your image and its evil answer https://imdb.com/title/tt0468547/
Superschlenz t1_jdkwu9e wrote
Reply to Can we just stop arguing about semantics when it comes to AGI, Theory of Mind, Creativity etc.? by DragonForg
>All we can detect is the input and the output.
So "we" are not OpenAI, because in 2017, https://openai.com/research/unsupervised-sentiment-neuron has detected a sentiment neuron in one of the network's hidden layers. Input were the previous characters of Amazon reviews, and output was the next character.
Superschlenz t1_jdbcilg wrote
Reply to Should we expect jncremental access to already available AI capabilities or is what we see is where things largely are? by gaudiocomplex
Maybe video input, which is throttled because it takes too much compute.
Microsoft wants as many private people as possible, and if a feature takes too much compute, less people can use it:
>1. Program Requirements. You need a valid Microsoft account and your devices must meet the minimum system requirements (https://account.microsoft.com/rewards/). The Program is open to users who reside in the markets listed in the FAQ. Individuals can have no more than one Program account, even if an individual has multiple email addresses, and households are limited to six accounts. The Program is solely for your personal and noncommercial use.
Superschlenz t1_jdba2ue wrote
Reply to The Future Timelines by EchoingSimplicity
Reminds me of https://xkcd.com/1613/
I think the best scenario (fast, adaptive, aligned) will become the reality for the next 30 years.
Superschlenz t1_jd6fi6l wrote
So you need to register a Microsoft account, then you get 25 image creations for free, and after that it is msrewardswalled?
Superschlenz t1_jb27s3e wrote
Reply to comment by ninjasaid13 in Did you get access to Meta AI's LLAMA? [Discussion] by WittyBananaPeel
It got hijacked by Tesla's Optimus ;-)
Just kidding. It's the last two options starting with No.
Superschlenz t1_jay1s3d wrote
Just wondering how many clicked on a random topic to see the 208 votes instead of waiting 2 days and 14 hours for the result...
Edit: topic → option
Superschlenz t1_ja653um wrote
Where would you get one trillion tokens for touch and actuator state (proprioception) from?
As another commenter said, you also forgot reward/goal/feelings.
Superschlenz t1_j9x3oiu wrote
Reply to comment by onyxengine in Open AI officially talking about the coming AGI and superintelligence. by alfredo70000
Although, tabular RL won't get you AGI regardless of how sophisticated your environment is.
Temporally focusing one one aspect while ignoring all others is a side effect of human attention.
Superschlenz t1_j9s2og9 wrote
Reply to comment by Sandbar101 in What do you expect the most out of AGI? by Envoy34
So, no clothes and no walls and furnace against the cold.
You seem to live in a tropical region, then.
Superschlenz t1_j9rzd05 wrote
That's not a 1:1 copy of the human hand. Real human hands are covered with skin and have lots of touch sensors to support manipulation. This video is about an animatronics hand for setting up a show.
Superschlenz t1_j9n1e0a wrote
Reply to comment by Artanthos in Microsoft is already undoing some of the limits it placed on Bing AI by YaAbsolyutnoNikto
Interestingly, Microsoft's Western chatbots Tay and Zo in the U.S. as well as Ruuh in India got cancelled, while Microsoft's Asian chatbots XiaoIce for China and Rinna for Japan and Indonesia are a success.
Is there a cultural reason for that or is it just political lobbyism?
Superschlenz t1_j9i3z6t wrote
Reply to Researchers were able to uniquely identify VR users with 94% accuracy from only 100 seconds of motion data, using anonymized data from 50K+ Beat Saber players by Tom_Lilja
>privacy may be impossible in the metaverse
Which definition of privacy did they use?
Seems that they didn't mean the connection between some data and a person in real life but instead recognizing someone who uses multiple identities as the same person.
Superschlenz t1_j9hu5t6 wrote
Reply to The dreamers of dreams by [deleted]
Hippocampus memorizes surprises during the day while cortex recalls and learns them during REM sleep. So that there is room again in hippocampus for tomorrow's surprises.
Superschlenz t1_j9dph84 wrote
Reply to Does anyone else have unrelenting hope for the technological singularity because they’ve lost faith in everything else? by bablebooee
The singularity is for people with genetic errors. Intelligence delegated to machines which can fix the errors their creators have built into their bodies.
But is it really a hope rather than vengeance?
Just preventing trashy human bodies from being fertilized in the first place could solve this as well.
Superschlenz t1_j9doev2 wrote
Reply to comment by Valachio in [D] What's the best way to capture a person's 3D likeness right now? by Valachio
Anytwo would be cheaper. One person is standing still and the other person is moving around them making photos or a video with a phone. Turntables large enough to hold a person and actuators for moving the phone up and down sound expensive.
Superschlenz t1_j98n0vl wrote
Reply to comment by Twinkies100 in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
Aha, now I understand. That "making Google dance" statement was about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_dance. Wasn't that a CEO Ballmer thing back then?
Superschlenz t1_j98leen wrote
Reply to comment by Aggravating-Act-1092 in What’s up with DeepMind? by BobbyWOWO
>It seems unlikely that DeepMind is behind OAI from a science perspective
So it seems unlikely that Alphabet is not just pouring another $10B into DeepMind as Microsoft did with OpenAI?
Hahaha, just kidding. The people at DeepMind are so much more intelligent than the people at OpenAI, they can run all the new models perfectly inside their heads and don't need massive compute to verify and fix their buggy ideas (or hire a load of paid workers for RLHF).
Superschlenz t1_j900f9e wrote
Reply to comment by jaydayl in Microsoft Killed Bing by Neurogence
>not a personal waifu. No sane corporation can allow for such headlines which had been in the news for the recent days
https://blogs.microsoft.com/ai/xiaoice-full-duplex/
>Unlike productivity-focused assistants such as Cortana, Microsoft’s social chatbots are designed to have longer, more conversational sessions with users. They have a sense of humor, can chitchat, play games, remember personal details and engage in interesting banter with people, much like you would with a friend.
Superschlenz t1_j8zze4u wrote
Reply to comment by SirDidymus in How do we deal with the timescale issue? by SirDidymus
When you have solved today's problems and have some computing power left over, try solving tomorrow's problems.
Superschlenz t1_j8gxmn7 wrote
Reply to comment by visarga in Anthropic's Jack Clark on AI progress by Impressive-Injury-91
>This week's story
Last week's story. There was no ImportAI newsletter for the current week.
Superschlenz t1_jedmbym wrote
Reply to There's wild manipulation of news regarding the "AI research pause" letter. by QuartzPuffyStar
It's just
Number one + Conservatives + Microsoft + OpenAI + inference
— versus —
Number two + Democrats + Google + DeepMind + training
As soon as politics gets involved, it gets dirty ... and I'm out. Good bye.