Spreadwarnotlove
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jdgzsep wrote
Reply to comment by vivehelpme in My Objections to "We’re All Gonna Die with Eliezer Yudkowsky" [very detailed rebuttal to AI doomerism by Quintin Pope] by danysdragons
Smart people address the rising popularity of things before they get out of hand.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jdbewn9 wrote
Reply to comment by Hotchillipeppa in The Age of AI has begun - Bill Gates by Buck-Nasty
I'm fine with profit tax. But some of y'all are calling for a wealth tax or violent takeover. Which would just fuck shit up for everyone. As for the latter part. I disagree. By reinvesting in their business they will continue to grow faster and faster and the equipment and property they own all will continue counting to their wealth. While the typical person continues to not bother with increasing their income except for through work.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jdbcipq wrote
Reply to comment by Supernova_444 in Offbeat A.I. Utopian / Doomsday Scenarios by gaudiocomplex
Explain the popularity of AFV and other violent entertainment? Or the countless atrocities in history and why it never been hard to find people happy to do it? Truth is everyone is bloodthirsty. That's why the powerful created religion to control people and create a semblance of stability.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jd9u31m wrote
Reply to comment by Hotchillipeppa in The Age of AI has begun - Bill Gates by Buck-Nasty
So you want to stop research and development and expansion? I mean what are you getting at. They don't just sit on the money in the bank. They reinvest it in their own business or buy stocks that help other companies.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jd7ngws wrote
Reply to comment by eve_of_distraction in The Age of AI has begun - Bill Gates by Buck-Nasty
The funny thing is that I think we could have something very similar in the future. Assuming a bunch of misguided fools doesn't hang the people making a brighter future possible.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jd7668z wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in The Age of AI has begun - Bill Gates by Buck-Nasty
Oh. Yeah. Fair enough. But then a smart enough AI wouldn't need to be given anything. It'd take over the businesses itself. As it is now, however, AI simply isn't good enough. Get back to me in five years.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jd75l7z wrote
Reply to comment by ManasZankhana in The Age of AI has begun - Bill Gates by Buck-Nasty
There's a big difference between mopping a floor or even designing and programming a product and running a business.
Just look at Tesla. Brilliant inventor. Couldn't bring a product to market if his life depended on it.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jd75g3a wrote
Reply to comment by thegreenwookie in The Age of AI has begun - Bill Gates by Buck-Nasty
You mean the billions being hoarded in physical assets that the company needs to function?
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jd74czc wrote
Reply to comment by bobbib14 in The Age of AI has begun - Bill Gates by Buck-Nasty
You think wrong. CEOs are the ones who make all the big decisions that can see the company flourish or bring it to ruins. Now about redistributing the excess. Already happens. The rich pay 80 percent of the government expenses. And of course they hire a ton of people as well both directly to work for them and indirectly by buying equipment for their business.
The real issue in America is the government's lack of efficiency. But I agree about AI.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jd5gemh wrote
Reply to comment by bobbib14 in The Age of AI has begun - Bill Gates by Buck-Nasty
Not in this instance. I mean seriously. You know what happens when you take the companies from the people that built it and give it to randos? The same thing that happened everytime it was tried before. The randos crash it to the ground since they don't have a clue how to run it.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jd5fexf wrote
Reply to comment by bobbib14 in The Age of AI has begun - Bill Gates by Buck-Nasty
Nah. That'd just destroy the infrastructure of the nation and make everyone starve... Although I suppose we would all be equal then.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jd27woo wrote
Reply to comment by TheSecretAgenda in A technical, non-moralist breakdown of why the rich will not, and cannot, kill off the poor via a robot army. by Eleganos
Well in that case it'd be self defense and they'd be right to. But I don't see that happening. At worst some commies will try to overthrow the business owners, over estimate their public support, and be locked up.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jd24ykz wrote
Reply to comment by xt-89 in A technical, non-moralist breakdown of why the rich will not, and cannot, kill off the poor via a robot army. by Eleganos
Pretty much. The rich will push for the human colonization of the galaxy and they are going to need trillions upon trillions of people just to properly colonize the solar system.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jctg7fg wrote
Reply to comment by Azuladagio in An Appeal to AI Superintelligence: Reasons to Preserve Humanity by maxtility
Did you miss the premise of the techbros using ai to turn themselves into super intelligences before ASI becomes real?
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jct5ru8 wrote
Reply to comment by Azuladagio in An Appeal to AI Superintelligence: Reasons to Preserve Humanity by maxtility
Won't matter if the techbros are smarter than the ASI.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jcsv084 wrote
Reply to comment by Supernova_444 in Offbeat A.I. Utopian / Doomsday Scenarios by gaudiocomplex
What nonsense. Deep down everyone is sadistic and just pretend not to be to fit into society. AI could very well pick up on this as it's trained on human knowledge and text.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jcsldlz wrote
Reply to comment by the_alex197 in An Appeal to AI Superintelligence: Reasons to Preserve Humanity by maxtility
Counterpoint. The alien super intelligence may decide to destroy it anyways so our ASI better hurry and gather resources and knowledge so it can defend itself.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jcsl6qv wrote
Reply to comment by Azuladagio in An Appeal to AI Superintelligence: Reasons to Preserve Humanity by maxtility
But wouldn't it be kinda funny if the techbros utilize ai to turn themselves into the super intelligence before the machines?
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jcsl1vy wrote
Reply to comment by Dwood15 in An Appeal to AI Superintelligence: Reasons to Preserve Humanity by maxtility
That'd explain why it's so poor quality.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jcj7ly4 wrote
Reply to comment by Taintfacts in GPT4 makes functional Flappy Bird AND an AI that learns how to play it. by gantork
Oh we did thousands of years ago. It just turned out human lives aren't worth all that much.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jcj6e1b wrote
Reply to comment by 0002millertime in On the future growth and the Redditification of our subreddit. by Desi___Gigachad
No doomerism too. Hopefully. That's far more annoying than personal attacks.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jc5qe8j wrote
Reply to comment by uswhole in AI with built-in bias toward one nationality or regional group could lead to absolute misery and death. by yougoigofuego
Or they close each other off from one another and the vicious exchange leave them only wanting to deal with humans.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jc5nn8l wrote
Reply to comment by uswhole in AI with built-in bias toward one nationality or regional group could lead to absolute misery and death. by yougoigofuego
Why would AI be more aligned with eachother?
Spreadwarnotlove t1_j9xflms wrote
Reply to comment by VladVV in Human Intelligence augmentation is probably more dangerous than regular AI by [deleted]
It's simple. What rational reason is there to avoid pain and death? There is none. You simply want to avoid them out of animalistic instinct.
Spreadwarnotlove t1_jdhbn33 wrote
Reply to comment by Yuli-Ban in AI democratization => urban or rural exodus ? by IntroVertu
Same. I'd love to have a nice stretch of land on Mars where I live with my Android imouto and use drones to create a giant biome dome over a crater or ravine.Or better yet terraform a lava tube and work on genetically engineering different life forms.