>There's nothing wrong with positive eugenics, ie encouraging high quality people to breed
Who gets to define "high quality people" and decide who measures up to the definition? Who checks their work to make sure they're being honest and objective? Who checks theirs?
Space_Pirate_Roberts t1_j8cld40 wrote
Reply to comment by Lears-Shadow in You're probably a eugenicist by 4r530n
>There's nothing wrong with positive eugenics, ie encouraging high quality people to breed
Who gets to define "high quality people" and decide who measures up to the definition? Who checks their work to make sure they're being honest and objective? Who checks theirs?