Songoffireandice

Songoffireandice t1_j8gs2x6 wrote

I intended to mean it was a similar mechanism in the broader sense that reducing unnecessary sensory stimulation is likely advantageous, using a specific example I was certain of as a token reference in the case of auditory development.

Retraining may not even be a good idea, as I can say with first hand experience being hyper-reactive to subtle emotional visual cues doe's not make functioning in society generally any easier. It does make you potentially better at reading people you are familiar with though.

I like your angle as a vestigial function, and after finding the study posted I think it's better supported than my speculation. What really interests me is the specificity, especially in the lack of reaction to happiness, but not entirely unexpected. Happiness, sadness, anger, disgust, contempt, fear, and surprise are all universal to our expressions. With that being said, I would like to at least have seen anger tested in addition, as we currently attribute the amygdala to processing fear and anger specifically.

2

Songoffireandice t1_j8eor67 wrote

Going to hard disagree for a second, but I'm not paying $35 to review the study so please provide more information on those studied.

Those with borderline personality disorder would be populations I would be interested in seeing the commonalities, as it's already well prove that micro expression mind reading is a prevalent trait in these subsets.

If this is similar to how we learn to stop hearing dialect sound patterns for instance, then there is a strong case for this being a trained perception, particularly in cases of childhood trauma before your brain start trimming out excess information.

Also, neurodivergent is a stupid term to begin with, who the heck is neurotypical? It's best measured in degrees, if that. Even the most average person across all metrics is exceptionally unique in their normative tendencies I'd posit.

2