SocialMediaDystopian
SocialMediaDystopian t1_j3g4o9s wrote
Reply to New psychology research provides insight into the impact of sexual passion styles among long-term couples: Too much control over one’s sexual passion harms the sexual satisfaction of both partners by lolfuys
What a garbled mess.
Also- seems sexist. Says that inhibited sexual style is "problematic" ( the style that women more often have) - right after saying that when women are "obsessive" and their male partners are inhibited, it's "surprisingly" almost always a net positive.
Ie inhibited style is only a problem when the female partner exhibits it (or both do- but even here the implication is if the woman can be "less prudish" there's no problem).
No discussion of what might be driving "inhibition" in any of these cases.
And again- a garbled f-king mess. Ah....psychology. To think I studied it :S
SocialMediaDystopian t1_izhjehr wrote
Reply to comment by olddoc1 in 2 common drugs may help protect against secondary cancer, small Israeli study finds by TheGuvnor247
That particular example would not be statistically significant though- precisely because there's a decent enough chance of it happening randomly
SocialMediaDystopian t1_iy6k3b0 wrote
Reply to LPT: Use chopsticks when you are having a snack at your computer. Not only does it help with eye hand coordination, it also allows you to snack at the computer without getting s*** on your keyboard. by sparrows_silence
Lol. What? Chopsticks? Unless you use them all the time, sh-t is definitely ending up on your keyboard. And the floor. And the screen. And.....
My lord. This was very confusing (and funny).
Sheesh🤣
SocialMediaDystopian t1_j6upxmm wrote
Reply to Trees could reduce mortality from urban heat waves by a third by YoanB
This is so depressing ie that fact that in 2023 itxs "news" that trees are important to mocroclimates/human survival/life on the planet.
Like f-ken "DER".
Yes I get that it needs to be laid out in a paper to get anything done.
Yes I get that it's "good" to officially "know".
But...fuuuuuuuc.
We've known for decades that it would not lead to good things to not pay attention to this.
Now we're here frantucaly trying to patch things up from the wrong end of history and we have to watch the scientific equivalent of toddler level concepts being floated as "surprising and/or important".
Just....f-k.