Skavau
Skavau t1_j6pcu37 wrote
Reply to comment by Possible-Extent-3842 in I don't get the love for The Last of Us episode 3 by [deleted]
Tbf, TWD had a bunch of non-action filler episodes too.
Skavau t1_j68du8b wrote
Reply to comment by TheEndofF in Drowning Pool - Bodies is a modern metal classic by TheEndofF
>Rock is not even relevant anymore, rock/metal is dead. All the good stuff they could come up with is already released. The genre has given everything it has to offer and now we are just keeping it alive via life support. Time to unplug the machine, if the music is uninspired trash it is uninspired trash.
This is not remotely true. Rock and Metal are hugely active, and highly varied.
Skavau t1_j63fhmy wrote
Reply to comment by N0VACA1NE66 in Victor Zee - Reve [Ambient Lofi] (2023) by N0VACA1NE66
I will add it back, but just be cautious regarding that subreddit for general stuff
Skavau t1_j63fa9q wrote
Reply to comment by N0VACA1NE66 in Victor Zee - Reve [Ambient Lofi] (2023) by N0VACA1NE66
No, it's primarily used by self-promoters
Skavau t1_j63f4mt wrote
Reply to comment by N0VACA1NE66 in Victor Zee - Reve [Ambient Lofi] (2023) by N0VACA1NE66
r/shareyourmusic is a self-promo subreddit, so doing that marks it up
Skavau t1_j63f0h6 wrote
Reply to comment by N0VACA1NE66 in Victor Zee - Reve [Ambient Lofi] (2023) by N0VACA1NE66
you posted it to r/shareyourmusic
Skavau t1_j63eabl wrote
Reply to Victor Zee - Reve [Ambient Lofi] (2023) by N0VACA1NE66
/u/N0VACA1NE66, your submission has been removed from /r/listentothis for:
> Self Promotion/Personal or Professional Association
We do not allow personal projects to be posted in /r/listentothis. If you have a personal or professional connection to the artist (e.g. friend or family member or this is a video you directed or produced, etc), we consider this as doing promotional work on the artist's behalf. Please post this in our weekly music melting pot thread.
Note: If you continue to self-promote after being warned, your account may be banned, and the artist your posting may be blacklisted from the sub permanently without the ability to appeal.
If you have any questions or believe that there has been an error, you may [PM the moderators](http://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=/r/listentothis&subject=Please review my post). You may also click here to see our full rule set.
Skavau t1_j5twy23 wrote
Reply to Testing the claim by Ted Sarandos that Netflix does not cancel "successful" shows by applying some actual numbers by [deleted]
A detail missing here are the shows varying budgets. What Netflix can be criticised for is throwing too much money, and thus expectations, at shows that are just not likely to meet it. It was obvious that Cowboy Bebop, and Resident Evil were doomed to be cancelled when they released. They were too high-budget, too risky and even a relatively positive reception wasn't likely to translate to enough watchers.
They set shows up to fail too often by doing this.
Skavau t1_j5tq5qz wrote
Reply to comment by KhaosElement in Ted Sarandos says that Netflix has “never canceled a successful show” by avery5712
No, but I meant even if it did, it was unlikely to gain enough watchers.
Skavau t1_j5tnesb wrote
Reply to comment by PJJefferson in Ted Sarandos says that Netflix has “never canceled a successful show” by avery5712
A detail missing is that Netflix clearly throws too much money, and thus expectations, at a show that is just not likely to meet it. It was obvious that Cowboy Bebop, and Resident Evil were doomed to be cancelled when they released. They were too high-budget, too risky and even a relatively positive reception wasn't likely to translate to enough watchers.
They set shows up to fail too often by doing this.
Skavau t1_j5tndyc wrote
Reply to comment by psychomama2 in Ted Sarandos says that Netflix has “never canceled a successful show” by avery5712
Not a Netflix production
Skavau t1_j5tn9q1 wrote
Reply to comment by Informal_Cress9800 in Ted Sarandos says that Netflix has “never canceled a successful show” by avery5712
This may be literally true, but a detail missing is that Netflix clearly throws too much money, and thus expectations, at a show that is just not likely to meet it. It was obvious that Cowboy Bebop, and Resident Evil were doomed to be cancelled when they released. They were too high-budget, too risky and even a relatively positive reception wasn't likely to translate to enough watchers.
They set shows up to fail too often by doing this.
Submitted by Skavau t3_1036pkr in television
Skavau t1_j2eea78 wrote
Not sure I'd call Heartstopper an "under the radar" show
Skavau t1_j1zxd0q wrote
Reply to comment by SereneAdler33 in Characters that hold shows back by mranimal2
It was following the comics. It would have been a significant change to not do it, and comparable to GOT not doing the Red Wedding
Skavau t1_j1r19du wrote
Game of Thrones is not a historical drama
Skavau t1_j1nvwe2 wrote
Reply to comment by ElectricPeterTork in How do you define filler? by monkeyskin
There was a Walking Dead episode purely focused around a character trying to cook food and deal with a rat, and another character crashing their motorcycle in the forest.
100% filler. It was completely pointless. It was a pandemic-influenced episode, but it was completely useless.
Skavau t1_j1nr84g wrote
Reply to How do you define filler? by monkeyskin
>Whereas the shows that endure most with audiences are reruns of The Office and Friends, shows that largely stuck to the 24 a season model that you can dip in and out of. (Disclaimer, I love The Wire.)
True, but this is more noting that older sitcoms are just sticking (and partially sucking the life out of newer sitcom potential). A 24-episode procedural format works much more effectively for sitcoms that often function as semi-background noise.
That isn't really directly competing or scratching the same itch as shows like Dark, or The Wire, or Game of Thrones.
Skavau t1_j0mokfi wrote
Reply to comment by MINKIN2 in [Super Curious] 🫠Why is British TV series short like every season holds up for 6 episodes max? by aparnasesha
But we do have more TV shows than we did in the noughties
Skavau t1_iyf403b wrote
Reply to comment by bjb406 in BBC to produce ‘lighter’ content to attract Britons from poorer backgrounds by do_or_pie
Ted Lasso, Pachinko, Heartstopper, Schmigadoon, The Good Life, Schitt's Creek, My Brilliant Friend
I mean most sitcoms too
And a lot of Korean TV is slushy as hell
Skavau t1_iy0zleq wrote
Reply to Most anticipated shows for 2023 by cneogy
Severance S02, Last of Us, Sweet Home S02, Arthdal Chronicles S02, All of Us Are Dead S02
Skavau t1_ixkhdqx wrote
Babylon Berlin. It's a neo-noir psychological thriller series set at the tail end of the Weimar Republic. It deals with the looming emergence of Nazis and the breakdown of Weimar democracy. Art Deco, Gangsters, Dance choreography and decadence
The advertising for it to Americans is shocking. S4 isn't even legally available there yet.
Skavau t1_ix6su2g wrote
Reply to comment by CptNonsense in TV’s True Crime Obsession Is Reaching a Tipping Point by HumanOrAlien
Do you consider Neo-Westerns westerns? Or Weird West?
Skavau t1_iuwjr7n wrote
Reply to comment by LetMeBangBro in Fall 2022 TV Ratings: CBS Has Ups and Downs While NBC Remains Top-Rated and Most-Viewed by misana123
Like I am from the UK and the average terrestrial TV watcher now is over 60.
I see no reason it's not similar in the US
Skavau t1_j6pdvvk wrote
Reply to A Case of Review Bombing - The Last of Us Episode 3 by johnohyahe
I feel like I'm seeing double. A thread basically about this was posted yesterday.