Shadowfalx
Shadowfalx t1_j96254v wrote
Reply to comment by wewbull in Why are fevers cyclical? by Key-Marionberry-9854
There also isn't a reason to think the body would evolve a way to stay in fever after vital load drops. Remember, evolution is random and if this never randomly occurred we wouldn't evolve it.
Shadowfalx t1_j961xa3 wrote
Reply to comment by Mercerskye in Why are fevers cyclical? by Key-Marionberry-9854
This is the worst kind of amateur take.
Humans have generally had a few days to weeks of fat reserve plus some extra weeks with muscle. The calorie cost of raising your temp 4°F is low. Plus, we have, since becoming human and probably long before, lived in groups (often familial) that help each other.
Shadowfalx t1_j1e7ri3 wrote
Reply to comment by Dougle_07 in What caused this? by TrashAtEverything_
Shadowfalx t1_j1e4kqn wrote
Reply to comment by Dougle_07 in What caused this? by TrashAtEverything_
Yeah, sure, I'm Steve Jobs, so I know what I'm talking about.
You said the message and the battery degradation percentage are connected.
Shadowfalx t1_j1dvws7 wrote
Reply to comment by Dougle_07 in What caused this? by TrashAtEverything_
You're wrong. These shouldn't occur at 80%. Apple recommends replacement at 80%, that doesn't mean the battery is unable to provide the necessary amperage at 80%.
You are doubling down because you don't want to be wrong, it's okay to be wrong.
Shadowfalx t1_j1dtm27 wrote
Reply to comment by Dougle_07 in What caused this? by TrashAtEverything_
What does this message say?
I'm pretty sure it says that performance was affected. Thus, you are arguing with yourself. You are saying Apple gives these messages when the phones performance is affected by decreased battery capacity at 80%, yet that battery capacity isn't affected until less than 80%.
Shadowfalx t1_j9756f9 wrote
Reply to comment by wewbull in Why are fevers cyclical? by Key-Marionberry-9854
You are correct but are missing the forest for the trees as they say.
The original mutation is random, benefiting (or at least not harming) is selected for. So without the random mutation there isn't anything being selected for.
For example, say we need to change gene 1 from A to C for the fever to last 1 hour longer (this is very simplified of course) but throughout history no one has changed gene 1 to C then there will be no longer fever to select for.
We can't see evolution as something that moves creatures along with intent. Nothing is guaranteed since you must first have a random mutation to progress.