SenorTron

SenorTron t1_j2835dh wrote

This doesn't seem quite correct:

"During inflation the speed of light (C for ease of conversation here) was obviously higher because C is the fastest anything can travel in the universe."

While no information can travel faster than C, inflation of the universe doesn't necessarily count for that because no information is being transferred faster than light. Indeed we're pretty sure that in the modern universe it is expanding at a rate such that some points are moving away from each other faster than light.

23

SenorTron t1_j27ry79 wrote

Netflix says that in the first three weeks there were 150 million different households that streamed Wednesday.

There are 1,814,400 seconds in three weeks. If viewings were equally spread out (in reality they'd be more clumped) that means 83 households had to start watching each second, so there were definitely a bunch of people watching at the same time as others.

61

SenorTron t1_isnb317 wrote

Yeah but the people and equipment to gather it were already there in Boston. Are you factoring in the time and cost to transport people down to and back from Antarctica, house them, and the higher wages they'd need?

Someone elsewhere in the comments used the analogy of modern supply chains and it's entirely accurate. It's the same reason it's usually cheaper to buy a household item produced on the other side of the planet than one produced locally.

1

SenorTron t1_isn7cl7 wrote

Sounds like a whole lot of costs, when the alternative is to buy it from a company in Boston already producing ice and just pay for a few extra weeks of shipping time.

2