RollinThundaga

RollinThundaga t1_j990ccl wrote

For general reference; a 10 decibal increase in sound intensity is an apparent doubling of the loudness.

130 decibels is the human pain threshold. A lawn mower is around 90 decibels. A normal conversation is about 60 decibels.

6

RollinThundaga t1_j89aoyh wrote

All of those bits of life acting on their own require liquid water, a gaseous atmosphere, and a certain temperature range to exist.

So, if we find liquid water and a certain temperature range on another planet, it's more likely we'll find life there than on, say, the scorching hot/near absolute zero, radiation blasted vacuum of Mercury.

1

RollinThundaga t1_j85xoxl wrote

🤷‍♂️ nobody said it can't happen, we just have exactly zero evidence so far.

A solid chunk of the mars missions are dedicated to determining if life does/once could have inhabited the planet.

Unfortunately our sample size for life is one, so we look for eathlike planets in other star systems becauae that's the only type of place we DO know that life can occur.

3

RollinThundaga t1_j7dtwb3 wrote

Drake equation.

Take the probability of all of the variables that allow a planet like Earth to host life, and multiply.

Unfortunately, with a definite sample size of one, there's disputes tp be had about which variables to include, and depending on these you either get millions of inhabited technological planets in our galaxy or 1>x>0, which we know not to be the case, as it happened once.

2

RollinThundaga t1_j43yazj wrote

It's functionally unplantable and literally goes dark for months of the year. The outposts are run off of diesel generators. Unless you either set up a nuclear plant or an entire oil/gas refining industry there (which will wreak havok on what fragile ecosystems there actually are) then there's not many avenues to do so with current technology.

It's not that we're 'not motivated' as much as 'motivated not to'.

10