Rogermcfarley
Rogermcfarley t1_je4aysg wrote
Reply to comment by Mercurionio in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
I don't know your location and georestrictions to this technology and Humans will always monetise technology. Whether your fears will be truly realised I don't know. We do need to seek open and honest access to this technology. The genie is released and there is no going back anyway. I'm not sure we really know how this is going to go but we can make educated guesses. We do weaponise technology so undoubtedly this will be used for both good and bad that is a side effect of technological progress.
I don't see any major issues with access to this technology currently. Then again I don't live in a country with any georestrictions and I use free access rather than any paid plans currently.
Rogermcfarley t1_je49uqh wrote
Reply to comment by Mercurionio in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
Is ChatGPT available in Afghanistan?
Ans : No, ChatGPT Not Available For Users In Afghanistan.
Is ChatGPT available in other Countries Also?
Ans : Yes, ChatGPT is Available In Other Countries also. But Due To Some Issues ChatGPT Not Available In These Countries North Korea, Iran, China, Cuba, and Syria etc. Full List Of all Countries Given Above
Can you use ChatGPT with VPN? Yes, you can use ChatGPT with a VPN. This is especially useful if the technology is blocked in your home country or school. A VPN, such as NordVPN, helps easily bypass restrictions and use the chatbot no matter where you are.
This is obviously applicable to ChatGPT. I haven't looked at Google Bard. I have tried it briefly but don't know about the georestrictions in relation to Bard.
Rogermcfarley t1_je48rld wrote
Reply to comment by Mercurionio in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
It's early days with AI I don't know how much will be paywalled. However if it's part of your job then your workplace will pay for it. If you're learning then there will be student access. It is just a tool and there's much hype about it. I don't see any immediate threat that humans won't overcome and adapt to. The progress is startling but that's where we've got a little tripped up. I don't as of yet associate fear with AI just more possibilities. It really depends if powerful people get to gatekeep the power of future AI. That's something we don't yet know.
Rogermcfarley t1_jdzdkls wrote
Reply to Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
Do whatever you want. I've retrained 4 or 5 times in the last 30 years. I don't have a set idea of what job I must do all my life. AI is just a tool don't be frightened by it. Learn to use the tools at hand.
Rogermcfarley t1_jdzciym wrote
Reply to comment by LimerickExplorer in Scientists discover how cancer cells evade immune system by BousWakebo
Jesus: Yeah wait until you have a mission 2000 years from now. I'm still getting ready.
Rogermcfarley t1_jd8wiam wrote
Reply to comment by __The__Anomaly__ in Endgame for f****** society! by tiopepe002
Second time I've seen this recommend this week. Will have to check it out
Rogermcfarley t1_jckcz8p wrote
Reply to comment by fieryflamingfire in Discussion: the goal of human existence should be avoiding the heat death of the universe by Mickeymousse1
1.7x10 to the power of 106 is an unimaginably vast amount of time. Currently we live on a rock in space so we'd need faster than light travel to get anywhere meaningful which of course would alter time relative to the initial position. I can't predict what will be possible. However as a species we have existed for a negligible amount of time. I honestly can't imagine humanity existing even a million years from now. Anyway It's not something any of us living today will find out. It's possible Humans will wipe themselves out before then, hypothetically speaking we might create ASI which could decide to wipe us out or we may interface with machines and eventually lose our biological state.
Rogermcfarley t1_jchc96g wrote
Reply to comment by fieryflamingfire in Discussion: the goal of human existence should be avoiding the heat death of the universe by Mickeymousse1
That would be applicable to the whole of humanity?
Rogermcfarley t1_jchaori wrote
Reply to comment by fieryflamingfire in Discussion: the goal of human existence should be avoiding the heat death of the universe by Mickeymousse1
Why would that be advantageous?
Rogermcfarley t1_jcggclw wrote
Reply to comment by fieryflamingfire in Discussion: the goal of human existence should be avoiding the heat death of the universe by Mickeymousse1
There's almost zero chance humanity will exist the time frame is around 1.7×10 to the power of 106 years. It took 13.8 billion years of cosmic history for the first human beings to arise, and we did so relatively recently: just 300,000 years ago. 99.998% of the time that passed since the Big Bang had no human beings at all; our entire species has only existed for the most recent 0.002% of the Universe.
Evaluating those figures says to me it's extremely unlikely this should be of concern. I will never know how long humanity exists but it's likely to have come and gone in a negligible amount of time compared to the timeframe for the heat death of the universe to be realised. In fact for the amount of time Humans have existed there could be a hypothetical reincarnation of humanity billions of times in that timeframe. The task for humanity to exist this long is overwhelmingly against it ever happening. In fact humanity it's almost definite we'll make no dent in that timeframe and will have ceased to exist trillions of years before the Universe ends.
Rogermcfarley t1_jcfjtkh wrote
Reply to Discussion: the goal of human existence should be avoiding the heat death of the universe by Mickeymousse1
Humans will likely cease to exist as the biological entities that we are now. If we get AGI/ASI then humans will have to biologically interface with machines. I can't imagine humans with their biological frailties surviving billions and billions of years it seems unlikely.
I'm uncertain of the purpose of survival as an end goal. It seems to have no other purpose than to exist and keep replicating/surviving into the future.
I would like to know if matter as we know it can be created out of nothing, although nothing has never been witnessed by Humans there's always something. Logically everything that exists if traced back must have come from absolute nothing. We haven't proved absolute nothing exists though. Of course something coming into existence would appear to be a time based event. So if time doesn't exist then there is no beginning or ending as they are events as a function of time.
Anyway I find the thought of everything existing from absolute nothing extremely puzzling much more so than wondering about existential crisis of the human condition.
I'm not sure how Humans could evade the heat death of the Universe, if that's the actual reality facing us, regardless it's a bold assumption to assume humanity will exist significantly into the future whereby we exist long enough to be there at the end.
Rogermcfarley t1_jb6q8xh wrote
Reply to comment by dineramallama in At the time of its 2176 quadricentennial, what will American society and technology look like? by artofterm
I think I've done Math wrong again
Rogermcfarley t1_jb45c2r wrote
Reply to comment by katholique_boi69 in At the time of its 2176 quadricentennial, what will American society and technology look like? by artofterm
I would be 106 by then. Unlikely for me to live that long unless there's some major anti aging advances in the next 10-20 years.
Rogermcfarley t1_jazooid wrote
Reply to comment by green_meklar in With The Help Of AI, By When Will There Be Drugs That De-Ages Humans And Keeps Us Forever Young? by AnakinRagnarsson66
Generate actual consciousness or an illusion of consciousness? The issue is the definition of consciousness itself and there are multiple philosophical definitions and thoughts on consciousness. Even if a machine appears to have conscious thought it doesn't mean that machine is actually conscious. I for example believe I'm conscious because I have awareness of my surroundings and inner reflection of my being. Of course that is my own belief in my experience. However a person could believe they are the only conscious being in the Universe because they only experience their own Intrinsic consciousness, of which they assume is the same as other humans.
So whether a machine has actual consciousness in the way humans experience consciousness there doesn't exist a test. We can perform experiments/tests to see if the machine is representing consciousness in the same way we do but that doesn't mean the machine is conscious.
Rogermcfarley t1_jalo044 wrote
Reply to comment by green_meklar in With The Help Of AI, By When Will There Be Drugs That De-Ages Humans And Keeps Us Forever Young? by AnakinRagnarsson66
Surely we'd need to understand the basis of consciousness first. What is the principle construct of matter that forms consciousness? At what point does consciousness arise from organisation of matter? What are the mechanisms involved etc?
Rogermcfarley t1_ja2oeqa wrote
Reply to comment by NxPat in How far off are we from not needing to learn languages? by AmericanMonsterCock
That's all this current AI is, a tool. There are no Victorian lamp lighters any more because electric lighting was invented. There are no VHS video stores anymore because DVDs and Blu Rays exist and whilst they co-exist most people stream There's 1000s of examples whereby technology automated or made job roles extinct and this is no different currently. We will adapt and use the tools given to us. Eventually when machines can replace so many of our roles then we'll need technology to integrate this commuting power with our biology. That is some way off being fully realised.
Rogermcfarley t1_j9zedki wrote
Reply to comment by El_muscely_beardo in Poland has delivered tanks to Ukraine, government announces on war's first anniversary. by Rifletree
I've worked with many Polish people. Really cool people. I never learnt to speak Polish but I can swear all day long in Polish.
Rogermcfarley t1_j2fotvd wrote
Reply to comment by big_duo3674 in Ukrainian air defense will become stronger in new year – Zelensky by Espressodimare
I seem to remember the USA being in a war with Iraq since Vietnam happened.
Rogermcfarley t1_j1qk4t6 wrote
Reply to My 2023-2028 predictions by Most_readit
Lithium based batteries are going to be replaced with one of the sodium based battery tech.
Rogermcfarley t1_j1pl4we wrote
Reply to comment by warmfeets in I sometimes fear that AI will wipe out the active joys of mankind. by AdeptInspector7210
Dave, please stop saying that Dave
Rogermcfarley t1_j1phmv3 wrote
Reply to Is it possible to Live Forever? by gg2ezpzlemonsqz
What is conciousness? How does the brain generate conciousness? Find the answers to these first then perhaps you can one day transfer your conciousness.
Rogermcfarley t1_j1iw8rz wrote
Reply to comment by UncleBenji in Ukraine Russia War Live Map: fighting overview, December 15-21. Near Bakhmut, Russian forces have concentrated the most combat-capable units of the Wagner PMC mercenaries, artillery and other equipment. Espreso News TV Ukraine by IceLArk
They've levelled the place so they'll just capture a lost city. Complete waste of time and resources for the Russians.
Rogermcfarley t1_j1fb6z0 wrote
Reply to comment by Scott4370 in If you guys could have any single innovation right now, what would it be? by Practical_Put_3892
I feel he should embrace the future and go wireless
Rogermcfarley t1_j1f807j wrote
Reply to comment by stumpdawg in If you guys could have any single innovation right now, what would it be? by Practical_Put_3892
Everyone, this guy when you need to charge your phone.
Rogermcfarley t1_je4gzn0 wrote
Reply to comment by Mercurionio in Degrees of the future by dustysaxophone
That's catastrophic thinking though. You are predicting something that you will make come true and the key word is you. I can't make promises for everyone but you already set your fate by your thinking. You need to be responsible for your future wherever possible. Your belief is what will ultimately hold you back or set you free.