Ah but this is since the covid pandemic.

Do you have figures from developed countries that we could use to compare here?

India is already a part of Quad (India, US, Aus, Japan), but the UK is missing from that. India is also running military exercises with some major western countries, but hasn’t signed any mutual defence pact. They won’t join an alliance that requires that anytime soon.

Armoured ambulances…

> Mr Blinken reiterated US support for a two-state solution as "the best way" to bring security to the two sides.

I don’t think western nations would draft (m)any soldiers. There almost wouldn’t be an invasion of another country (like China or Russia) by a western nation, it’d probably be a war on the seas or in the skies. Which you need to train soldiers for.

US already has mutual defence pacts with Japan. And India is already working with US, Japan and Australia (Quad alliance), but does not have a mutual defence pact. India wouldn’t sign a mutual defence pact just to join an expanded AUKUS.

> The largest was Sinno Electronics, which is named on U.S. sanctions lists, but not by the European Union.

There’s something called the Quad that already exists. India, US, Aus, Japan. India doesn’t share a mutual defence pact with any of these countries and joining this new expanded AUKUS alliance would not require such.

Then open it to the rest of Asia and make it CAUKUSIAN (Caucasian).

Which are the German planes?

> “I made it clear very early on that it’s not about combat aircraft and I’m doing that here too,”

I don’t get it. What’s not about combat aircraft? This article also claims that Germany has ruled out sending jets, but does not provide enough of the quote / context as evidence.

The rest of the article is about ground troops and no fly zones.

Can you link that?

Misleading headline. He did not say that. (At least not in this article, or any others I’ve read so far)

Where in the article does it say that though?

I’ve recently had to actually read BBC articles because their headlines always mislead me, especially with the headlines like “Ukraine isn’t happy with how little aid the west gives them”.

> In an interview with Tagesspiegel, Mr Scholz said his focus was on the delivery of German-made Leopard 2 tanks.

>"The fact we've only just made a decision [on sending tanks] and the next debate is firing up in Germany, that just seems frivolous", he said.

How is that ruling out sending jets? Can someone link an article where it actually quotes what he said?

Is there a way to determine whether a man killed an ex partner in a revenge / hate killing or a sexist killing? Like an interrogation or something.

Is a woman doing the same also sexist under Spanish law?

Both.

Could the rate of murders not just be due to physical differences rather than sexism? Generally speaking, it’d be harder for a woman to kill a man, than the other way around.

I don’t understand how a crime could be sexist unless it’s on an individual level. What you’re saying doesn’t make sense to me. That’s the same as saying any white person committing a crime against a black person (in the US, UK, etc.) is committing a racist crime, regardless of whether or not the race was reason for the crime.

This is the part I don’t understand.

So not all domestic violence murders would classify as sexist under Spanish law? Just those where the reason was the victim thinking “women shouldn’t leave their husband” rather than “she left me, I want revenge”?

Yeah I’m just trying to learn why that is considered a sexist crime. I would just consider a violent revenge / psychopathic crime. What in particular makes it into a sexist crime? Just if it’s a man attacking a woman?

Is being murdered by an ex-partner considered sexist? If so, what exactly makes it sexism?

(Genuine question, I’m not saying this is okay, just asking which part makes it sexism)

Thanks

Thanks.