Reselects420

Reselects420 t1_je1yimn wrote

You can’t just make up your own metric of judging whether a country is developed or developing, and decide that everyone should update their dictionary.

Pakistan is a nuclear power with a GDP per capita only a little lower than India’s. Is Pakistan a developed country?

Here, I’ll do one better. Iran. Higher GDP per capita than India, space program, possibly nuclear status soon. Are they a developed country? If not, is it just the figure of exports that matters, not the distribution of that figure?

49

Reselects420 t1_j9zrecg wrote

Some countries aren’t able to just make a switch like that. For example, India’s military is made up mostly of Russian equipment and technology. The US (and India itself) is trying pretty hard to change that, and quickly, but it takes time. You can’t expect a country with two large, hostile, nuclear neighbours to give up its source of defence equipment.

9

Reselects420 t1_j8xixoj wrote

According to the article, the UK’s offer is an entirely new engine designed specifically for India, and India owns it, produces it, and can decide itself whether to export it. I’m not sure if the US would be willing to match that, but it’s possible.

37