QLaHPD
QLaHPD t1_j65zcvt wrote
Reply to Don't despair; there is decent likelihood that an extremely large amount of resources will flow from AGI to the common man (even without UBI) by TheKing01
Probably the mean user will get some kind of gerenal Siri, not the Skynet.
QLaHPD t1_j5lauxj wrote
Reply to Steelmanning AI pessimists. by atomsinmove
What we might need is neural data, just wait until Neuralink release an dataset of 2 years of neural activity gathered from 2000 patients. With that you can train a diffusion model to generate brains.
QLaHPD t1_j5l9v0g wrote
Reply to comment by tatleoat in Steelmanning AI pessimists. by atomsinmove
An AI that only responds to prompts and an AI that has " will of its own" are the same thing. If you train a model to mimic the behaivor of a dog, for a outside observer it will look like it has developed some kind of initiative. The human behaivor can be expressed as a sequence of tokens, thus, you can train a model to predict the next action given context.
QLaHPD t1_j4hm72l wrote
Reply to Does anyone else get the feeling that, once true AGI is achieved, most people will act like it was the unsurprising and inevitable outcome that they expected? by oddlyspecificnumber7
What is AGI actually, ppl usually say "an AI that can do everything a human can"; but to what degree, it need to be at least at human level in every task? Some humans are better in some things than others, yet we all are "AGIs". To me, AGI will be an AI that can make my personal, brain loss decrease without escaping from the distribution. It probably will require an BCI.
QLaHPD t1_iushn73 wrote
Reply to comment by AI_Enjoyer87 in Most impressive Text to Video Generator so far (Google AI) by Janicc
Get ready to moon crash.
QLaHPD t1_jeg8l2h wrote
Reply to When do you guys think chatgpt 5 is gonna come out ? by Klaud-Boi
Never, I thing they will change the name to a more apelaing one. Should be in 2025. Research takes some time.