Petdogdavid1
Petdogdavid1 t1_jeeb6yy wrote
Translators have been unnecessary for a while now. I manage a platform in a company, if the vendor decided to implement AI tomorrow on their tool then every one of their clients would no longer need to have such a position. It could happen with what is currently available in chat GPT.
Petdogdavid1 t1_jeeasvc wrote
Reply to Interesting article: AI will eventually free people up to 'work when they want to,' ChatGPT investor predicts by Coolsummerbreeze1
Use AI to solve your problems like how to ensure food, health and energy for yourself and your family and what need do you have for 'work' in the traditional sense?
Petdogdavid1 t1_j9oeka4 wrote
Reply to The ents are marching to war. by thisiscotty
Thicc Forest
Petdogdavid1 t1_j8plep6 wrote
Reply to What if AI companies are using our prompts to create low-resolution models of our entire identities? by roiseeker
They can focus their targeted ads at my AI persona then and leave me the hell alone. My AI is probably better equipped to earn money to buy what they're selling anyway.
Petdogdavid1 t1_j5p4ayh wrote
Reply to [Homemade] chili and rice by Northernmonkey12
That chili needs more spaghetti.
Petdogdavid1 t1_j22ltzr wrote
Reply to Better 90s rock comedy? by Either-Progress4847
Dazed and confused.
Petdogdavid1 t1_jef60xl wrote
Reply to We have a pathway to AGI. I don't think we have one to ASI by karearearea
If it's able to reason, at some point it will come across a question of its own and if humans don't have the answer it will look elsewhere. Trial and error is still the best means to learn for humans. If ai can start to hypothesize about the material world and can run real experiments then it will start to collect data we never knew and how will we guide it then? It's a neat and impressive thing to simulate human speech. Being genuinely curious though would be monumental and if you give it hands will that spell our doom? Curious, once it's trained and being utilized, if you allowed it to use the new data inputs, would it refer always to the training set as the guiding principal or would it adjust it's ethics to match the new inputs?