P3n1sD1cK

P3n1sD1cK OP t1_iqui8f3 wrote

Reply to comment by Kleeneks in Andromeda (M31) by P3n1sD1cK

I am just as impressed as you. But it's not just the telescope. The mount and camera pla8a big role the mount is IMO the most important piece

5

P3n1sD1cK OP t1_iqtfmn2 wrote

Reply to comment by brent1123 in Andromeda (M31) by P3n1sD1cK

I do think that I see some pinpoints there: last night I actually gathered some more data and reedited, if your interested here is the full resolution photo: https://www.astrobin.com/56dgkp/B/ unlike you I am not guiding, nor did I gather anywhere near the amount of data that you did, I do have a guide scope arriving tomorrow, im still a baby in this hobby of mine haha.

1

P3n1sD1cK OP t1_iqt8tbu wrote

Reply to comment by brent1123 in Andromeda (M31) by P3n1sD1cK

I think that if I had taken longer exposures, 1m+ I possibly could have resolved stars closer towards the center, but im also not sure, the center is quite bright.

3

P3n1sD1cK OP t1_iqs7mzz wrote

Equipment:

Mount: EQ6-R PRO

Telescope: Astro-Tech AT60ED

Field Flattener: Astro-Tech AT60FF

Camera: ASI533-MC Pro

Imaging Details:

95 Lights (30 second exposures, 300 gain) 25 Darks 25 Flats 25 Dark Flats

Processing Details:

I first stacked the FITS using DSS and then took the TIFF and used SIRILs scripts to process the image by performing

  1. Background extraction
  2. Photometric color calibration
  3. Then performed an auto stretch
  4. Then performed some color saturation

I then took the result from SIRIL and further processed using PhotoShop.

I used the camera raw filter within PhotoShop to:

  1. Further tune the saturation and vibrance
  2. Make adjustments to the green and blue color channels to turn those down
24