Obvious_Cranberry607
Obvious_Cranberry607 t1_j1trgem wrote
Reply to comment by LumberjackWeezy in "Speed up" terraforming of Mars by using Enceladus' icy crust? by LumberjackWeezy
It's the same thing, just a difference of timing. I suspect that having them hit Mars has a higher chance of success though, because I think Mars would be moving sideways slower than they'd be accelerating towards the inner solar system. Think trying to time walking fowards into a perpendicularly thrown ball, rather than having the thrower lead it and bean you in the side.
Obvious_Cranberry607 t1_iy4qw4m wrote
Reply to comment by Antimutt in Switzerland urged to officially renounce nuclear weapons by aaaronbrown
CERN isn't a nuclear weapon.
Obvious_Cranberry607 t1_ixoz2u5 wrote
Report it and see if others have already reported the event stuff their own sightings: https://fireball.amsmeteors.org/members/imo/report_intro
Obvious_Cranberry607 t1_iwp7as6 wrote
Reply to comment by Batmack8989 in is Artemis 1 going to the moon? by sci3ntisa132
Or Apollo 13 without the drama.
Obvious_Cranberry607 t1_je25wqd wrote
Reply to Why from Earth do we see all these stars but in images taken from space we see none? by Suitable-Victory-105
The ones you are talking about are adjusted to properly expose an object that is brighter than the stars, which means the stars will usually be too dim to notice. If you look at some pictures of dim objects, like the Earth at night from the ISS (https://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/Videos/CrewEarthObservationsVideos/) you can definitely see the stars.