Notreallyonreddityet
Notreallyonreddityet OP t1_ir3mkbx wrote
Reply to comment by iemailrobi in Humans operating on humans are still better than robots operating on humans...even when a human is operating the robot. by Notreallyonreddityet
My dudes, this guy here is the inventor...not kidding.
Notreallyonreddityet OP t1_ir2oanq wrote
Reply to Humans operating on humans are still better than robots operating on humans...even when a human is operating the robot. by Notreallyonreddityet
Similar results were found when they looked at the insurance claims from robot cases in spine surgery across the country. Taking away a physician’s ability to confirm what they are doing in real-time and requiring a massive setup of hugely expensive equipment is only likely destined to lead to these poorer results. Companies like TrackX Technology help mitigate the same problem (ie-radiation exposure to the patient, physician, and the entire OR team) which actually makes surgery quicker and more accurate is a good start. Likely miniaturization, optimization, and combining the best attributes of each of these different technologies hold the best hope to help all of us get the help we need in terms of quality outcomes in surgery. Here's a video about the platform, how it works, and how it's safer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tftObMt18OY&list=PLqtLSZO9d2iim-2ZfAef01qzO-Asw0uv3&index=40
Notreallyonreddityet OP t1_ir48fuo wrote
Reply to comment by Talkat in Humans operating on humans are still better than robots operating on humans...even when a human is operating the robot. by Notreallyonreddityet
Very cool. Curious if you would share why? I haven't had much surgery, and all of mine were done by humans with terrific outcomes.