Nde_japu
Nde_japu t1_j1zzr0j wrote
Reply to comment by klystron1837 in $44,999 50 year Balvenie Scotch whisky by Android9765
So you're saying there's little to no difference from a well drink vs a 20 year aged scotch? Just marketing? There's nothing snobbish about that, it's just common sense that a $20 bottle isn't going to be as good as a $150 bottle.
I agree with your sentiment that it becomes mostly a status thing to pay for a $1000 bottle or 10,000 bottle. After you get much over $100-200 there is a law of diminishing returns.
Nde_japu t1_j1wio1b wrote
Reply to comment by klystron1837 in $44,999 50 year Balvenie Scotch whisky by Android9765
It shows you have zero understanding of alcohol consumption. A $150 bottle of scotch, whiskey, tequila or bourbon is leaps and bounds better than a slim jim and everclear. Much of it involves the aging process, which is why 20 year old scotch costs more than than a 12 year scotch, which costs more than no aged everclear
Nde_japu t1_j21yspn wrote
Reply to comment by klystron1837 in $44,999 50 year Balvenie Scotch whisky by Android9765
I will check it out