MikeWise1618
MikeWise1618 t1_j67w5w6 wrote
Reply to ELI5: How does ChatGPT work? by Zurbinjo
It is a direct decendent of the same techniques used to help you type by predicting the next word on smartphones and chat programs.
People found they could improve those models using trained artificial neural networks to learn prediction patterns. These evolved into very large models that have to train for very long times on humongous amounts of data on a very large number of computers.
Papers on these have been criticized for showing little architectural innovation or cognitive insight., just scaling things up massively.
But the results certainly produce many hitherto obtainable aspects of human intelligent discourse, even it is impossible yet to tell if any cognitive model building is going on in that artificial neural network.
MikeWise1618 t1_iyf5a1o wrote
Reply to comment by ExtonGuy in Disassembling a planet? by InsaneRabbitDaddy
That's not what I see there. It leads with the statement that numerical simulation is invalid after a few 10s of millions of years.
It then points out that n-body problems can only be handled that way.
It goes on with investigations of known resonances and puts limits on their behavior.
I don't see 100 percent anywhere.
MikeWise1618 t1_iyeykr6 wrote
Reply to comment by Bensemus in Disassembling a planet? by InsaneRabbitDaddy
And our math is not powerful enough to prove stability in the same sense rhat we use for human designed systems.
MikeWise1618 t1_iycuab7 wrote
Reply to Disassembling a planet? by InsaneRabbitDaddy
Intuitively very little. And we can simulate that for a bit.
But theoretically we have a problem. Our math and physics can't even prove the configuration we have is stable even though the evidence very strongly indicates that it is - seeing that we can tell that there have probably been no major changes in things for billions of years despite constant perturbation coming from comets and other things probing the system.
So the answer is probably not but we can't be sure, theory doesn't help much and simulation suffers from exponential growth of measurement error in the initial state.
MikeWise1618 t1_iuckak2 wrote
Reply to comment by Blaine8182 in How many Germans does it take to change a lightbulb? by Typical_Furry1234
Yeah, it really doesn't seem like a particularly efficient country anymore. Trains are definitely not reliable anymore for example. Bureaucracy is stifling. Anything goes wrong gets blamed on COVID.
MikeWise1618 t1_iu5smdb wrote
Reply to comment by isnisse in spreading life to other planets or moons in the solar system by isnisse
Probably the biggest reason we don't do that at the moment is the fear that it could eliminate native life forms that we could learn a lot from. Probably overblown as the native forms are likely to be better adapted. But certainly possible.
MikeWise1618 t1_j6ozbtt wrote
Reply to Loved this game back in the day. Always played as the Spartan faction by organictamarind
Loved this game and so did my son. The ability to design custom units was awesome and didn't get to explore that enough. Wonder if you can a copy that would run on a modern desktop.