McRattus
McRattus t1_j2vln2h wrote
Reply to comment by hillsons in Microsoft aims for AI-powered version of Bing - The Information by blueberryman422
So you would not consider the product of fancy algorithms to be AI?
I agree term is over used and misused.
Gpt seems like a decent candidate for an AI though.
What do you think lives up to the term?
McRattus t1_j2v4ybt wrote
Reply to comment by hillsons in Microsoft aims for AI-powered version of Bing - The Information by blueberryman422
This isn't that, it's GPT integrated search.
Which could really challenge Google.
McRattus t1_itypihb wrote
Reply to LPT When talking to people, give them only as much information as needed. Never over-share things. Information is important. You don't want to think back wishing "I shouldn't have said that" by [deleted]
This is not good advice. If you are competing with them, maybe. But sharing information is the basis of cooperation, withholding useful information is not good for cooperative interactions.
McRattus t1_j2voj9u wrote
Reply to comment by hillsons in Microsoft aims for AI-powered version of Bing - The Information by blueberryman422
I think that's a reasonable argument.
Neural networks do learn though. In a way that's is quite analogous to neural systems. One way of thinking about neural systems like a rodent brain follows a set of rules that unfolds through partially determined neurodevelopmental design principles. Like neural networks realworld neural systems are constrained by, b but not fully determined by their original design.