MariachiBoyBand
MariachiBoyBand t1_izpvie9 wrote
Reply to comment by Cheshire90 in An analysis of 4511 vaccine-related tweets show that anti-vaccine messaging tends to focus on the "harmful" nature of vaccines, based on personal values and beliefs rather than hard facts. Anonymity did not affect the type of content posted, but did affect volume of content. by glawgii
I’m honestly tired of these off base emotional but ultimately bad faith arguments of “being deprived” of information when all that is being critiqued is the bad misinformation that is being peddled like some cheap currency. Maybe take the points that scientists are making also?? Add them to your narrative and see how it all plays out?
Most of the people that comment like this, rarely do any due diligence on their own “skepticism” and have a hard time sifting through the data and often get confused. Mind you, this CAN happen, to get lost in the information and no, it’s not because of intelligence, it’s mostly training and education.
MariachiBoyBand t1_izraydg wrote
Reply to comment by Cheshire90 in An analysis of 4511 vaccine-related tweets show that anti-vaccine messaging tends to focus on the "harmful" nature of vaccines, based on personal values and beliefs rather than hard facts. Anonymity did not affect the type of content posted, but did affect volume of content. by glawgii
Again, you’re using emotional pleas to “get your message”, the people that get a reaction, should speak out but also, the percentage of people that get a reaction should be part of the conversation. Generally when I read a message of a bad reaction to vaccines, it’s accompanied by absurd messaging of “what else are they hiding” paired with mistrust with no actual source nor due diligence as to the percentage of people affected, this is the crux of the bad faith arguments, fear and exaggeration of vaccines is part it.