ManOfDrinks
ManOfDrinks t1_j1zp2mf wrote
Reply to comment by Vtfla in Vermont state trooper suspended during investigation of barracks theft by casewood123
If you're against paid administrative leave in this circumstance, then you are either
A) Against it in all circumstances, including those where it is obvious no wrongdoing occurred and the subject will be exonerated, or
B) Automatically assuming he's guilty, will be fired, and could have been fired immediately if it weren't for those pesky rules saying we need to prove he did it.
Given you're apparently unaware this process is the standard for any unionized workplace, it seems likely that you just have some ideological beef with the police, and see police unions as an extension of the police rather than a union protecting its workers. If you're against collective bargaining, you're against job protections such as requiring investigation and cause for dismissal.
ManOfDrinks t1_j1zfcb3 wrote
Reply to comment by Real-Pierre-Delecto2 in Vermont state trooper suspended during investigation of barracks theft by casewood123
I was saying maybe we should focus our energy on getting more places to unionize, so the protections that come along with unionization aren't exclusive to a few select labor markets.
ManOfDrinks t1_j1zbeyz wrote
Reply to comment by MarkVII88 in Vermont state trooper suspended during investigation of barracks theft by casewood123
What does a seemingly unrelated story from 8 years ago have to do with this ongoing investigation? What does anyone's salary have anything to do with this?
ManOfDrinks t1_j1z78ts wrote
Reply to comment by Real-Pierre-Delecto2 in Vermont state trooper suspended during investigation of barracks theft by casewood123
Bootlicking is when you support fair labor practices, got it.
ManOfDrinks t1_j1z4bzw wrote
Reply to comment by MarkVII88 in Vermont state trooper suspended during investigation of barracks theft by casewood123
Luckily we don't have to imagine because the publicly accessible salary database is linked directly in the article everyone here definitely read.
ManOfDrinks t1_j1z35x4 wrote
Reply to comment by Vtfla in Vermont state trooper suspended during investigation of barracks theft by casewood123
Good point, we should do the right thing and just fire people without cause.
ManOfDrinks t1_j1udrvm wrote
Reply to comment by AllThisFakeFruit in Vermont Gov. Scott considers banning TikTok on state cellphones by blutbad_buddy
Nobody is talking about axing existing social media accounts used in an official capacity. This is about state employees using their state issued mobile phone to install TikTok for personal use.
ManOfDrinks t1_ivomiz6 wrote
Reply to comment by flambeaway in Why Phil Scott again? by rufustphish
"I heard Vermont had slavery removed so it could suck its own dick."
ManOfDrinks t1_ivolcxz wrote
Reply to comment by bigmountainbig in NYT isn’t even waiting for results to come in before calling our senate race. by elliotloudermilk
Unless they're Jay Inslee
ManOfDrinks t1_iuefj4z wrote
Reply to comment by ArkeryStarkery in Vermonters—legalize eagles asshole Mallory is a Jan 6th supporter by Jsr1
There's a difference between what people say about a candidate 6 months before an election and what data-driven polls say two weeks before an election.
ManOfDrinks t1_iu9rfmp wrote
Reply to comment by kazame in Vermonters—legalize eagles asshole Mallory is a Jan 6th supporter by Jsr1
Trump wasn't running in a race that was going to be an obviously one-sided hulk smash.
ManOfDrinks t1_jedk2we wrote
Reply to comment by Nutmegdog1959 in Proof that capitalism won’t solve the affordable housing crisis. by No-Ganache7168
None of what he listed amounts to directly providing funds, they're all tax incentives to make building homes a feasible business venture where they otherwise wouldn't be.