M17CH
M17CH t1_j9wfn5c wrote
Reply to comment by Intruder313 in Boris Johnson calls on UK to 'break the ice' by sending fighter jets to Ukraine - and warns China against 'historic mistake' by R1ckCrypto
They aren't using it incorrectly. It has taken on a new meaning in the modern world. The historical definition is not the "correct" way to use it.
M17CH t1_j9v8oog wrote
Reply to comment by mayasky76 in Boris Johnson calls on UK to 'break the ice' by sending fighter jets to Ukraine - and warns China against 'historic mistake' by R1ckCrypto
It's not about being anonymous, that's the standard.
It's about thinking that posting a single phrase that you could have simply googled is proof at all of your ability to read, write, or speak Latin.
But you already know that. You're just trying to avoid it.
M17CH t1_j9uxuqr wrote
Reply to comment by mayasky76 in Boris Johnson calls on UK to 'break the ice' by sending fighter jets to Ukraine - and warns China against 'historic mistake' by R1ckCrypto
>need a reddit TIL to learn the meaning of the word decimate.
Yes. Historical meaning btw, not current.
>Sigh.... dei gratia sum quod sum eh!
Posting a phrase in Latin anonymously behind a screen is proof of absolutely nothing.
>We also know what well regulated means. We have a dictionary over here.
So then you would acknowledge that "well-regulated" in the historical sense is not prescribing heavy restrictions.
Either way, you're purposely using a long out of favour definition for a "gotcha" moment.
M17CH t1_j9ur0ug wrote
Reply to comment by nonrandomusername17 in Boris Johnson calls on UK to 'break the ice' by sending fighter jets to Ukraine - and warns China against 'historic mistake' by R1ckCrypto
That's not really how decimate is used in modern language, but go off though.
M17CH t1_j9uqva1 wrote
Reply to comment by mayasky76 in Boris Johnson calls on UK to 'break the ice' by sending fighter jets to Ukraine - and warns China against 'historic mistake' by R1ckCrypto
In modern usage it has a different meaning. I wonder if you subscribe to this same thought for the phrase "well-regulated."
Also let's not act like you aren't saying this because you saw the TIL from a couple days ago.
M17CH t1_j9wysa4 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Boris Johnson calls on UK to 'break the ice' by sending fighter jets to Ukraine - and warns China against 'historic mistake' by R1ckCrypto
>I see you have been googling English then you clever clever bastard... no let me guess you've been writing in esperanto and using Google translate for English.... naughty naughty
Correct.
>Some. People. Still .know Latin you muppet
Yes of course. Also please be nice.
>I did my amo, amas, amat at school and you probably know some like E plurubus unum. Or deus ex machina. There are commonly known Latin phrases and I can almost be certain that everyone i went to school with know dei gratia sum quod sum as it was said every frigging day in assembly.
I don't know any Latin.
>I even know a bit of Welsh too and some mandarin... how is that even possible
Good question.
>Jesus, you do know that people out there in the world know different stuff from you?
Yes.
I just find it a funny coincidence that there are so many experts on the origins and historical definition of the word "decimate" mere days after a popular post about just that word. If you had that in your data banks before then, then I am happy for you. It is still weirdly elitist and not even really all that accurate to consider that historical definition of "decimate" as the correct usage in the modern day. It isn't used that way anymore. It has taken on a new meaning. To say someone is incorrect for using it another way is not really true.
>stupid people implying decimation means complete destruction of something
People are not stupid for using the more recent and culturally accurate definition of the word. Please be nicer.