LogicalError_007

LogicalError_007 t1_j1pvk14 wrote

Ah, didn't knew about that. I thought a country's constitution would be above a state's law. It's stupid af. Seems so backwards for a developed nation.

Why didn't they reform this? I'm sure most people will vote in favour of having one set of rules in a country.

7

LogicalError_007 t1_j1p41fr wrote

Okay, then in next report I'm sure US will be regarded as partly free. Right...... Right?

They they won't be, if they will I'll happily take my L. But if they won't, why should India be called partly free?

26

LogicalError_007 t1_j1oj9jz wrote

Pakistan shouldn't even be partly free, they have annihilated the people of other religion. Army and government controls itself without having anything to check each other. Army being able to trample the government. This is not what freedom is.

33

LogicalError_007 t1_j1ocdgl wrote

Do you live here, I don't see how India is below many other countries.

Edit: Women doesn't even have right to their own body but US is above India, how? Must have been supplemented because of freedom to buy a gun and shoot at schools and public. What about people of colour being unfairly treated or killed?

Hmm, is it that only country that are 1st world developed giving funds to this organization are regarded as free. Every community votes in India, even at the remotest of the place, every non Hindu community got benefits here, poor people get food almost at no cost regardless of their caste or religion.

If US can be there after not allowing women to have rights on their body, I don't see why India also shouldn't be there.

65