Lisagreyhound
Lisagreyhound t1_iu6whqa wrote
Reply to comment by nhorning in If Robert waldow became so tall because of an excess of hgh, then why does taking hgh not make you taller? by Komoasks
Yes. I had forgot this point. I know it shouldn’t matter but it did / does to me.
Lisagreyhound t1_iu6wa21 wrote
Reply to comment by clinkzs in If Robert waldow became so tall because of an excess of hgh, then why does taking hgh not make you taller? by Komoasks
They had been measuring my growth since I was about 8, I think. So by the time I was in year 7 they had been tracking my growth for a few years. I went on the pill then (told no one at school what I was on).
I would have been fine with 6ft 1. It was the risk that it could be a lot higher that made me take the drug. It was a risk reduction exercise.
I think it’s a blunt instrument. So I’m a little shorter than perhaps I’d like, but that is the price I paid to reduce the risk.
Lisagreyhound t1_iu3cfuv wrote
Reply to comment by Sable-Keech in If Robert waldow became so tall because of an excess of hgh, then why does taking hgh not make you taller? by Komoasks
*she
It was AT LEAST 6 foot 1 but could be heaps more. This was back in the 80s and my growth trajectory was off the chart. Like above the 100 percentile, so in guesstimate territory.
In those days I was super skinny and could not find clothes that fit. So the idea of not being able to shop in normal shops was a major motivator. These days it wouldn’t be an issue.
Lisagreyhound t1_iu36lyq wrote
Reply to comment by ImAScientistToo in If Robert waldow became so tall because of an excess of hgh, then why does taking hgh not make you taller? by Komoasks
I was put on the pill in my early teens by an endocrinologist to reduce my height by making my growth plates fuse earlier. I would get X-rays of my wrist to check the growth plate. I was going to be at least 6 foot 1. I am 5 foot 11.
Lisagreyhound t1_ivnypwq wrote
Reply to comment by must_decide in Experimental “FLASH” cancer treatment aces first human trial by tonymmorley
The brca genes are both for breast and ovarian cancers. Detection of ovarian cancer is still terrible. So perhaps women with a brca gene survive BC but then get ovarian cancer? (A total guess).