LazyBox2303

LazyBox2303 t1_izwmte9 wrote

That may be true. But I would rather you answer my straw man question than discuss the way healthcare is organized in the U. S, I am also interested where you think you should live in order to receive the best healthcare? As for me, I’ve always been happy with the care I’ve received in Los Angeles.

1

LazyBox2303 t1_izuqxtp wrote

Doesn’t everything worthwhile cost money? The rich and the gamblers invest and build things most of us would never do. They do it to make money and to provide things people need and want.

I realize health care in the U.S. is expensive. Research is expensive too. If we were a Socialist country like Canada or England, the costs would be less. But we have many times more people here and I think the quality of service would go down and the waiting times, up. This would not be my choice.

A Socialist country might be a better choice for some people to live in and where health insurance is for everyone. I’ve been reading that Canada has Socialist health care. They are also very liberal in assisted suicides if they won’t or can’t provide care for expensive treatments.

1

LazyBox2303 t1_izuloo9 wrote

Let’s give credit to the factories that ARE trying to protect the environment. There are many who are not trying to poison the environment and doing what they can to clean up the water. The ones that dont follow the law need to be fined.

The “other side” also consists of people who love plants and animals. That love is not exclusive to any political party.

0