You talk of sanctioning China when the U.S is already doing everything it can to limit China's growth without calling it sanctions. New restrictions—including on exports, imports, direct investment, and financial securities.

Like shutting down Huawei and their 5G network, removing Huawei's position as the second-largest smartphone maker in the world.

An extension of Trump-era tariffs on Chinese solar

Sanctions on DJI, a company which had close to an 80% market share in consumer drones in the US.

The recent chip export controls.

There's also the global perception war, in which Congress proposes $500 million for negative news coverage of China .

> Australia has teamed up with China and more than 100 countries

Seems an odd choice of title, given it ignores so many other concerned nations.

How so? How else can we control such a devastatingly destructive, introduced species without harming our native wildlife?

That would be because it isn't designed to keep native Australian species safe if it's being used in New Zealand.

Ours are designed to protect our species:

> The incredibly tiny amount of 1080 injected into each wild dog and fox bait is deadly to those species but safe for native predators, including birds of prey (e.g. wedge-tailed eagles), reptiles (e.g. goannas) and the iconic spotted-tailed quoll. Despite incorrect claims that 1080 is harmful to these native species, in reality they are all known to eat meat baits poisoned with the compound 1080 and survive. 

Good. Rat poisons are terrible for wildlife.

Might be worth developing a natural solution like Australia has done, creating 1080 poison from the native Heart leaf poison bush (gastrolobium grandiflorum) to target introduced foxes and cats, and not harm native wildlife in the process.

Let's hope we never have to find out.