That’s about 1 in 5 on the very highest end and 3 out of a hundred for the initial estimate you gave.

it has been my opinion for a while now that while green energy and the like is desirable what will really solve this will be having good enough technology to brute force the issue.

i genuinely don't know why i am continuing this as i don't care for any of these people all that much but i guess stopping now would be weird but in my opinion what you described was not trying to ruin lives but trying to just squeeze as much productivity out of the agreement as possible it is unfortunate that in many cases the reality's of employment make responding difficult but this is an unfortunate world, the only responses that i can think of are unions or seeking a job elsewhere but both are easier said than done and both don't always work out.

There are billions of people in this world that I don’t really care about, many employees do not give a shit about their ceo and many ceos do not care about employees the relationship is strictly transactional in those cases.

But why would not caring make somebody a psychopath?

But why would they care, why is that an expectation?

There are more rich interested in selling to Africa than there are in making people more racist or something, from what I see all this panic about Africans comes from redditors and little else, but no you just must blame every little Ill of the world on some invisible, formless group of evil “elites” who have almost infinite power according to people on Reddit.

But if you didn’t you still had the same computer it’s not like your computer got worse you just had much better options.

But if you didn’t you still had the same computer it’s not like your computer got worse you just had much better options.

True Amazon does weird things to pay less taxes but they create a huge amount of value and their workers and shareholders of which there are quite a few are taxed.

those are taxes on value created by consumerism anyways obligatory ????

???

?

It’s people saying things like billion of people will die tomorrow if we don’t destroy the economy that get environmentalism laughed at.

Than you will get people who say the ai revolution and it’s consequences were a disaster because supporting le terrorists guy is edgy and “unique”.

Depends on the type of AI in my opinion. Complete removal of the human element can only really be done with an ai comparable to god in my opinion, with everything else you will need some level of collective human control in my opinion. It’s my belief that the correct way to solve many of todays problems is just to advance so fast that and far that things that would be difficult today are trivial, at least until aforementioned god AI comes along.

It seems like it depends on what kind of AI is put in charge by who and how. Ideally there would be literally only upsides.

It seems like it depends on what kind of AI is put in charge by who and how ideally there would be literally only upsides.

Obviously nothing has gotten better because there was problem than and now there is still problem /s

Why would I learn a less useful language.