KevinFlantier
KevinFlantier t1_jef2h7g wrote
Reply to comment by probablynotreallife in Privacy concerns are real. by sudobee
Yeah but you need to eat at some point you can't just pass everything
KevinFlantier t1_jeezn42 wrote
Reply to comment by YFleiter in Privacy concerns are real. by sudobee
That's the issue. Everyone thinks their data is irrelevant, but if that were the case big companies wouldn't by buying those data in bulk for billions.
What you like, what you think, what opinions you have, even what game you play or what movie you enjoy can be used against you to manipulate you. Be it to steer you towards one election candidate, or to sell you shit. It will at some point be used against you without your knowledge. And the worst part is that it all feels insignificant, but it's definitely not.
Privacy is important, even if your data is cringe.
KevinFlantier t1_jeez6ar wrote
Reply to comment by tofiffe in Privacy concerns are real. by sudobee
I will argue this already exists online. Especially in the travel industry.
If you are browsing for plane or train tickets you should always do it in private mode because those cookies are going to drive the price up next time you connect.
KevinFlantier t1_jeez1aj wrote
Reply to comment by probablynotreallife in Privacy concerns are real. by sudobee
The next store over knows how much the previous store was charging you so they're gonna practice the same price with a marginal placebo discount. In the end you've lost a significant amount of time swapping stores for a very negligible gain, and you've been robbed either way.
KevinFlantier t1_jeeysge wrote
Reply to comment by probablynotreallife in Privacy concerns are real. by sudobee
That makes no sense YET
KevinFlantier t1_je4556r wrote
Reply to Alexa bring me milfs by mbhammock
If you want disturbing know that you can ask ChatGPT to create you a text-based role playing game, so basically you can ask ChatGPT to cosplay as your sex-slave.
KevinFlantier t1_j99xmvn wrote
Reply to comment by Beyond-Time in Scientists create carbon nanotubes out of plastic waste using an energy-efficient, low-cost, low-emissions process. Compared to commercial methods for carbon nanotube production that are being used right now, ours uses about 90% less energy and generates 90%-94% less carbon dioxide by Wagamaga
> Same with the monthly battery revolutionizing technology discovered that goes nowhere.
Then again this is always a very slow process. Any kind of battery breakthrough (assuming it's not bogus to make headlines) takes at least a decade to find its way to the consumer market.
So of course you're gonna hear about this revolutionary new thing on paper, then never hear about it ever again, and by the time it's available on the market -probably quietly- then the rest of the industry has also made many other improvements to the point that it's not the huge leap that was promised but more of a "hey the battery on this phone charges faster than on my older one... I think"
KevinFlantier t1_irwdgmt wrote
Reply to comment by wwarnout in Geothermal May Beat Batteries for Energy Storage: Enhanced geothermal systems are well suited to store excess renewable power as heat. by filosoful
If you generate enough power and your batteries are big enough, efficiency barely matters. A simple, easy and non polluting way to store energy would be a lot more useful than a very efficient one that relies on rare-earth metals, that is extremely expensive to scale up and that wears down over time.
KevinFlantier t1_jefboep wrote
Reply to comment by tofiffe in Privacy concerns are real. by sudobee
They deserve it though