Jctexan
Jctexan t1_jc1sgxo wrote
Reply to comment by JeromePowellAdmirer in CONFESSION TIME: If I know I can make the round trip within the allotted 1 hour I will only activate a single Light Rail ticket by kraghis
Welp, as long as you're sure, I guess I have no choice but to accept the terrible way we've been doing things thus far.
Sigh. The constant negativity is just so dull. It's so easy to say why something won't work - anyone can find a bunch of reason why something won't work. If we put half as much energy into figuring out solutions, maybe we wouln't be in this mess. We certainly can't progress as a society with that attitude!
Jctexan t1_jc08tc9 wrote
Reply to comment by JeromePowellAdmirer in CONFESSION TIME: If I know I can make the round trip within the allotted 1 hour I will only activate a single Light Rail ticket by kraghis
-
Just because something hasn’t been done, doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be done. How would things ever be improved upon if we never allowed change? That being said…see point 2.
-
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/14/zero-fare-public-transit-movement-gains-momentum.html
Jctexan t1_jbri0j8 wrote
Reply to comment by SadMaverick in CONFESSION TIME: If I know I can make the round trip within the allotted 1 hour I will only activate a single Light Rail ticket by kraghis
That’s why removing the pretend budgetary constraints will help.
Jctexan t1_jbre7i3 wrote
Reply to CONFESSION TIME: If I know I can make the round trip within the allotted 1 hour I will only activate a single Light Rail ticket by kraghis
Hot take: all public transit should be publicly subsidized aka free (charge personal cars in order to subsidize frequent, safe, and reliable transit and no one will want to drive).
Jctexan t1_jbfwk40 wrote
Jersey City: Make it yours!
Jctexan t1_jbausa6 wrote
Reply to comment by cgrave0480 in Ways to be apart of the community? by cgrave0480
If you’re part of Ward F, they also need a ton of volunteers for all kinds of things!
https://www.everythingwardf.com/volunteer-zone
They need everything, so you’ll probably find something interesting to sign up for. Very laid back initiative.
Jctexan t1_jb6g77a wrote
Reply to Lightrail on Warren St by st_igplg
Whoa! Awesome shot!
Jctexan t1_jb6fmwf wrote
Reply to Ways to be apart of the community? by cgrave0480
What neighborhood are you in?
Jctexan t1_jasbb1p wrote
Reply to St Mary of the Immaculate Conception on 2nd st told the funeral guests to just park and block the street. People parked, like me, who need to go can’t leave. What can I do? How is this allowed? by munchlaxsleeps
I honestly can’t believe this is allowed. This will get major news attention, IMO.
Jctexan t1_jaitmwx wrote
Reply to comment by JCwhatimsayin in Swimming? by Forward-Fan-7273
They stopped during the pandemic and I am still hoping they start up again soon! Haven't called in almost a year, tho.
Jctexan t1_jai1wyn wrote
Reply to Lease renewal question by Remarkable_Debate866
Then you definitely get 90 days. Call the landlord/tenant relation number just to be sure...but sounds like you've got 3 months time to find a new place.
Jctexan t1_j9kigza wrote
Reply to comment by 2amRendezvous in Area around Lincoln Park by [deleted]
It’s a lot less $$$ than other areas, so a lot of people, especially those who want nice and new, don’t have a lot of options.
Jctexan t1_j9ke98f wrote
Reply to comment by 2amRendezvous in Area around Lincoln Park by [deleted]
A new build Bayonne Box further out got $3400 but also had parking, which pushes the rental price higher. Average is just over $2700 for a 3/2. For a new build, $3k is pretty standard.
Jctexan t1_j9jx8b5 wrote
Reply to Area around Lincoln Park by [deleted]
West Bergen is a good investment. Proximity to light rail as well as the TON of new developments coming to the Westside and to 440, including Bayside makes the area a good bet, IMO.
​
3/2 rents should go for $3k for a new build with washer/dryer.
Jctexan t1_j9hezls wrote
Reply to comment by TechnologyPale329 in Just got our lease renewal numbers. For a 12 month lease renewal, our rent will increase over 10%. I don't see how this is sustainable long term. by chazthetic
Yikes. Did that include incentives like free months?
Jctexan t1_j9heexq wrote
Reply to comment by Nuplex in Just got our lease renewal numbers. For a 12 month lease renewal, our rent will increase over 10%. I don't see how this is sustainable long term. by chazthetic
This is my understanding based, too, especially regarding high-rise buildings. It can drive the overall values of an area up, while simultaneously helping to keep surrounding rents low by adding more supply. So there’s some give and take.
This is an interesting watch:
Jctexan OP t1_j97wi35 wrote
Reply to comment by nasty_brutish_longer in Why is planning allowing this building? Eli5 by Jctexan
Thank you! Really appreciate it.
Jctexan OP t1_j92t46w wrote
Reply to comment by Zorping in Why is planning allowing this building? Eli5 by Jctexan
Yeah, you might be right…it’s entirely possible, but it’s not the case from what I understood. The councilman (elected by the constituents who live in the area) voted against it based on community input and had been attempting to negotiate with the developer but got outvoted by other wards’ councilpersons.
Jctexan OP t1_j92sfjf wrote
Reply to comment by Zorping in Why is planning allowing this building? Eli5 by Jctexan
I live in Bergen Lafayette. I work and shop here, too. It is my community, if not my backyard. We can disagree on the way to get the pros of density without taking things personally.
Jctexan OP t1_j929rjy wrote
Reply to comment by JcpaNYC in Why is planning allowing this building? Eli5 by Jctexan
Yep, I looked and couldn’t find it. I’m pro-density, this isn’t my backyard, but…kk
Jctexan OP t1_j929j25 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Why is planning allowing this building? Eli5 by Jctexan
Jeesh, seriously.
Jctexan OP t1_j9299ax wrote
Reply to comment by NeverLickToads in Why is planning allowing this building? Eli5 by Jctexan
Why is everyone so afraid to read or research topics they claim to be interested in on this thread? I’m not asking for permission from the planning board here on Reddit, lol. I am asking if anyone knows why this building got approved. There’s years of history on it, and I’m curious if anyone has more knowledge. I am not here to bash anyone’s way of life, or where they have chosen to live, so I am not going to link to studies on high rises because I’m not interested in bashing high rises as the main point - it’s a distraction, it’s not the focus and I’m not looking to change anyone’s mind. If anyone wants to read about high rises and environmental impact, psychological impact on residents, the communities they’re in, they certainly can and don’t need to rely on strangers to help them research. It’s not “mysterious,” it’s Google!
From what I understand this building appears to already be a done deal and I’m looking to understand why. I have Googled and gotten as far as I can, and hoped someone might know. It’s ok if you don’t know. No one seems to know. Relax.
Jctexan OP t1_j91h1ui wrote
Reply to comment by Anonymous1985388 in Why is planning allowing this building? Eli5 by Jctexan
Yup, I do and yes, very hard to parent, work full time, volunteer, and sit in planning meetings, but I will keep on doing just that. It’s really curious why this was approved. The whole thing is so odd. Was really hoping someone had some knowledge I didn’t and it would all make sense.
Jctexan t1_je66g3b wrote
Reply to Is this legit? by Key_Performer_6012
Scam