Jakelshark

Jakelshark t1_j6y8dbl wrote

I know how it works. I have owned multiple houses (not at the same time, so put down your pitchforks)

I'm just trying to draw a distinction between the home loan part (what you get preapproved to spend) and the rest of the fees you're expected to pay monthly. The home loan part is traditionally a fixed payment, whereas the taxes/insurance can vary over time.

My last home was 860/month for the mortgage to pay principle and interest. Over 6 years the taxes/insurance went from about 300 to 400 a month.

2

Jakelshark t1_j6y6fun wrote

The rent v mortgage thing is understandable in that the bank is going to most likely require insurance and taxes to be paid in escrow. So the mortgage might be $1,500, but the bank needs $2,300 monthly or whatever because they don't trust most people to keep up with insurance and taxes on their own. And that's without getting into long term maintenance costs

1

Jakelshark t1_j51j56o wrote

I'm sure that's true. I just meant suing in civil court in general for emotional damages stemming from HIPAA violations which enabled a stalker. It's not suing for the breaches, it's suing for the damage caused by the breach. But also it seems like an uphill legal fight when the hospital seems to have dismissed all the violators. (And that's assuming the stalker has a police record, restraining orders, etc)

1

Jakelshark t1_j156sct wrote

It definitely causes major supply disruptions. When they cull they are shutting down the coop for a few weeks to remove the dead chickens and then thoroughly clean it. It's not just the ones they've culled, it's also all the ones they couldn't raise due contending with the outbreak. Plus you have to consider the disruptions caused to replacing egg laying hens

8

Jakelshark t1_j14wyfi wrote

There is a really bad bird flu that has decimated the chicken farming industry, driving up prices on all chicken related products. It's a national issue

As for the rotisserie chickens, they're a very popular loss leader to get people in the store. So some companies are willing to take more of a loss than others.

57

Jakelshark t1_isyrxj7 wrote

Reply to comment by Ok-Box8267 in Midterm by Ok-Box8267

I'm still convinced Trump ran in 2016 to make money and wasn't serious about winning. Just like I don't think he's that serious about running again, but is happy to send out fundraising emails all the time

(And I'm not saying Trump is a unique politician in this regard, just more brazen)

4

Jakelshark t1_isyrglk wrote

Reply to comment by mostassuredlyafish in Midterm by Ok-Box8267

Maybe he just saw the chance to be associated with a PAC, get donations to spend how the PAC sees fit (wink wink), and then when he loses...oh well. But the PAC keeps the money they did or didn't spend because it's not the candidate's personal campaign fund (wink wink)

6