Jaded_Prompt_15

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_j5v5cqm wrote

It's not even "legal opponents"

If a giant law firm brings any type of lawsuit against MSG or it's parent company, they refuse to let any employee in.

So say someone wants to sue MSG, any law firm that takes the case, gets all their employees banned from there and every other venue.

So the problem is that can be considered harassment to prevent firms from taking those cases

337

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_j5308d7 wrote

You can even claim "exempt" from withholdings for social security...

Every year, lots of idiots find that out. And they assume it means they're somehow exempt from it. Like, there's just a secret opt-out that no one knows about.

So they change it, and because they think it's a secret life hack, they don't tell people they found it.

Then Social Security calls their employer, locks them at a high deduction, and give them a giant debt.

Just pay taxes as you earn money, it's not worth the hassle

6

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_j2nxu4l wrote

> There is no magic rule that states this need be the case for a graph to be useful.

You didn't have to tell everyone you never took a statistical analysis class...

>only an idiot would assume that the bottom line is a zero

You don't even know what's wrong, if you weren't acting like this I would have taught you something.

−9