Jaded_Prompt_15

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_j1ncsqd wrote

Why would providers pay for that instead of doing it themselves? The AI would already be scouring the internet to see what it should make. If anything gains traction it would just make its own.

And why do you think the AI will be cheap enough that any random person can use it?

If it's available for "free" it's because they need people to train it.

I'm starting to think you have no idea what you're talking about

5

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_j1nc3ex wrote

Yep.

South Park went back and had AI change all their early episodes to wide screen, and it did an amazing job.

But it just means less animators.

Hell, you could have it randomly generated characters in a specific style, then either pick or let the AI choose based on what's popular.

Eventually AI will just be making shows completely on its own. Zero input from a person and can crank out a new one everyday.

11

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_j1mygn8 wrote

Basically Christmas....

It's why the Pilgrims tried to ban it in America, it wasn't a real Christian holiday, just a rebranded holiday from European pagans they didn't want to stop doing.

94

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixubka4 wrote

Waaaay back in the day when we had a mutual disarment some US and UN inspectors were there when Russia disarmed some nukes.

They said that only 10-25% were functional, but you couldn't tell which until you started dismantling them.

I don't think Russia is trying to fire nukes and failing.

I think they're actually checking them all now, and anything that won't work as a nuke is being launched.

76

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixu9dfu wrote

Yeah, but if you're a "dickhead" and she gave you a fake number...

Don't quiz women about shit like that, because it makes you a dickhead.

Give her your number. If she likes you. She'll get ahold of you.

Edit.

Nevermind OP is a woman trying to get people to buy her nudes. Or considering their comments, an incel selling some woman's nudes while pretending to be her.

Either way, just down vote and move on

3

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixokexo wrote

> If you clicked on the articles you wrote you’d be aware they are for premium subscribers

I haven't written any articles...

But do you think a staff writer gets away with three articles in three years?

>realize that it’s compromised by multiple people including NYT journalist and professors.

I expect that to be just as true as your first one...

2

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixojwal wrote

But... You said:

>They are compromised of journalists who left Popular mechanic.

You showed me on ex-cop who only writes about UFOs and has three stories on a website...

He didn't "leave" Popular Mechanics if he was a freelancer...

Shouldn't it be easy to give me a name of someone who actually worked there and now writes for this blog?

7