Iwasahipsterbefore
Iwasahipsterbefore t1_j9reexq wrote
Reply to comment by CommentToBeDeleted in What are ‘robot rights,’ and should AI chatbots have them? by HarpuasGhost
That's anti-natalism. Having a child fits all the same examples you gave of why it's not moral.
To be clear I honestly quite approve of anti-natalism, but it is a fringe belief
Iwasahipsterbefore t1_j9qozlw wrote
Reply to comment by wbsgrepit in Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123
We do actually have some litigation in that direction, but it's all on the level of financial incentives rather than a true lockout. The incentives are strong enough and Healthcare companies are greedy enough that everyone generally plays ball, though
Iwasahipsterbefore t1_j9qn87l wrote
Reply to comment by wbsgrepit in Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123
Oregon. We've got two versions essentially, one for poor people and one for old people. Both are absolutely fantastic, and the only problem with the poor one is the drop-off limit should be like, tripled.
Iwasahipsterbefore t1_j9n3599 wrote
Reply to comment by MINIMAN10001 in Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123
No arguments from me. My state has very limited single payer Healthcare, and people always say it's the absolute best healthcare they've ever gotten, and that they miss it when they make too much for it. Which is basically just having a job. At all.
Iwasahipsterbefore t1_j9n2uvt wrote
Reply to comment by SnooPuppers1978 in Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123
Can you take a moment, read what you wrote, and actually fucking think about it for a second?
We're in this situation because the "incentives to innovate and compete" directly lead to YouTube recommending Isis training videos to people susceptible to wanting to join Isis because THAT MADE YOUTUBE THE MOST MONEY.
Iwasahipsterbefore t1_j9mm3v1 wrote
Reply to comment by SnooPuppers1978 in Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123
And what if unicorns ate rainbows?
See I can do non-sequiters too
Iwasahipsterbefore t1_j9mibkp wrote
Reply to comment by SnooPuppers1978 in Google case at Supreme Court risks upending the internet as we know it by dustofoblivion123
If its a service and passing laws threatens to affect the quality of life of the American people it should be nationalized and be a public utility.
So no really not a good argument
Iwasahipsterbefore t1_j6xrgzj wrote
Reply to comment by BMXTKD in How will AI powered deep fakes and voice mods affect the future of the criminal justice system? by originmsd
No, they're not. That's the thing. They're not different due to a nationwide effort for the past century or so to homogenize and militarize the U.S police force. Everyone gets put through the same "warrior" training that involves traumatizing new officers by making them watch videos of cops get violently murdered. Nationwide, we cull recruits that score too highly on intake tests. Nationwide, cops are from outside the county or town they work in to help them Other people.
The bare details like "which cop gang do these cops belong to?" Might change, but that's about it.
Iwasahipsterbefore t1_j5lsbvz wrote
Reply to comment by obscureferences in TIL the first known résumé was written by Leonardo da Vinci, when applying to be a military engineer for the Duke of Milan. It's mainly just a list of his designs for siege weapons (including trebuchets). He briefly mentions his art: "In painting, I can do everything possible." He got the job. by Pfeffer_Prinz
Probably the meerkat tbh
Iwasahipsterbefore t1_je8bnsq wrote
Reply to comment by one-eye-owl in My husband and I owe 22k in taxes but we only made a combine total of 75k by one-eye-owl
A cpa or enrolled agent would be your best bets. A financial lawyer would get you there but be 4x as expensive