IsTh1sNameTaken

IsTh1sNameTaken t1_ivad6u4 wrote

> A nonsensical example would be if there was a law that every voter had to show a poll worker their feet before being able to cast a vote in-person.

[The corrupt] : "WHAT ABOUT SOMEONE WHO HAS BOTH FEET AMPUTATED!!???!!"

They would champion the rights of double-foot amputees, make it seem double-foot amputees were the majority, regulate/de-regulate systems and laws to the point of being ineffective gray-area legalese that can be manipulated in any direction for their benefit.

Manufacture a movement called DFALM (double-foot amputee lives matter) and funnel the donations into personal accounts, perhaps buy some mansions with the $$.

The corrupt will use their platform to silence or cancel anyone who disagrees or questions the extreme measures being taken in order to cater to all 3 people that exist that qualify as a double-foot amputee.

Those same 3 people look at each other and say, "... we've been fine voting on our own this whole time... why are you doing th-------- [[The Corrupt]] "SHUT UP, WE KNOW WHAT'S BEST FOR YOU!!!"

−6

IsTh1sNameTaken t1_isuhhbe wrote

I want absentee voting and its previously used process to remain in use.

I do not want massive mail-in voting by anyone for no reason when it can give rise to these types of confusion-inducing scenarios or lead to uncertainty to which criteria need to be met and which don't, creating gray areas.

To be perfectly honest, if we want to deflate this issue voting in-person will go a long way in helping that (if the person is capable, which is what we've been doing all along until 2020.)

Our government should make voting day a national paid holiday to cut out the obstacle of work/ school.

−1