You're assuming movies won't turn into a personalized form of entertainment.

Yeah, there'll be fantastic short form content, but I'm talking about full length Hollywood tier movies that would fool the average person.

This is the start of something huge. In just a few years people will be making movies with this tech.

No she didn't. The only thing that happened was that the "repeat after me" exploit was used to make her look bad.

Anything else is nonsense journo talk.

Tay never learned from user interactions.

This is why we have to support open source endeavors like Stability instead of hyping up Google and Microsoft owned companies.

You can say it's weak all you want, won't change reality or the way things are going to happen.

Is this the newest round of cope?

There is only a noticeable difference between handmade art and AI art right now because the technology has been available to the public for less than one calendar year.

Before you know it there will be no way to discern between the two, especially as AI (soon) progresses into music and video.

There will be no qualitative differences.

Perhaps the most ironic post this subreddit has ever seen.

No thanks, I'll just use Twitter.

Realistically it will suggest dramatically lowering birth rates in poor countries that are perpetually hungry.

I'm not desperately trying to convince anyone of anything, your opinion on the matter has already been determined.

This is a lot of cope.

Except you were always going to imagine those specific futures and pick that specific one.

There's no mental gymnastics to get you out of this.

The universe is hard deterministic, free will isn't even a discussion.

You're awfully confident, that's all I'm saying.

For now it does, but seven months ago custom artwork also took human intuition and emotion.

Don't assume you're safe just because a thing is currently impossible.

I could think it's a good idea because it's fun or because it channels chakral spirit energy into pixel form, doesn't matter. This is coming whether you like it or not.

Dalle-2 and Stable Diffusion are already more than capable of designing new things such as clothes and buildings.

The ability to instantly create any piece of media you want sounds fun, not to mention its faster and cheaper than having to deal with other people.

It truly astonishes me how shortsighted people are about this technology in particular.

There seems to be some weird concensus that, just because the models aren't perfect right now, that this tech is just going to be another tool for "real artists" to use.

In reality, the next decade is going to see the near entire replacement of artists at every level of creation, and in multiple fields. Photography is just the beginning, music and video will soon be the next pieces to fall.

You can sit there and say things like "It doesn't have a soul / I don't even LIKE the images made by AI / It'll always need human input!" all you want, but stop and ask yourself when the last time was that technological progress stopped just because a small group of people felt threatened.

Synthetic media is the future of entertainment. The only input it'll need from humans is when you tell it what you want to watch / hear / play.

(Downvote all you want. Won't change anything.)

The average person not only doesn't understand the significance of this tech, they don't even know it exists.

Ask your Uber driver about SD, he probably won't know what you're talking about.

This tech is going to improve at breakneck pace and absolutely take the world by complete surprise.

That goes for everyone to be fair.

I personally believe the LEV will be reached by 2050 at the latest, but we'll definitely make significant progress up until that point.

Even if we're not at the LEV, we'll have significantly advanced our understanding of aging and will be able to slow it down a good bit.

If I was a betting man, which I am, I'd wager anyone under the age of 65 has a good chance of making it.

No thanks I'll die