The problem is with AI art specifically, not change/advancement in general. Art is a fundamentally crucial thing for humans - it gives more meaning to our existence as a means to express ourselves and leave our lasting mark on the world. Even right now with how it's being generated en masse, the world of art is quickly becoming over-diluted, expressionless and without purpose. It's essentially like an insult to humanity itself, like saying "there's no point for you to create any more".
You say that we should be perceiving this as a positive thing, and yet we are already seeing the results, and people are very much not "enjoying the thrill of discovery".
IcyyWizard t1_j3681f9 wrote
Reply to The future: our POV (ft. AIart issue) by thebestmtgplayer
The problem is with AI art specifically, not change/advancement in general. Art is a fundamentally crucial thing for humans - it gives more meaning to our existence as a means to express ourselves and leave our lasting mark on the world. Even right now with how it's being generated en masse, the world of art is quickly becoming over-diluted, expressionless and without purpose. It's essentially like an insult to humanity itself, like saying "there's no point for you to create any more".
You say that we should be perceiving this as a positive thing, and yet we are already seeing the results, and people are very much not "enjoying the thrill of discovery".