How_To_Police

How_To_Police OP t1_is7cv5f wrote

>History is always written from the perspective of the time it is done.

couldn't agree more

> Here you begin by the postulate that « all history books now are revisionist 

i don't recall ever saying that, what i mean is that the OVERWHELMING majority of the topic i research is historical revisionist propaganda written with the sole intention of propogating a political narrative.

> You want not to learn but to confort yourself in your own beliefs, it’s not how it is done.

i would like to challenge my beliefs, and if my beliefs are the modern day political narrative, wouldn't i want to find subject matter that is different then the current modern day political narrative if i truely want to challenge my beliefs?

1

How_To_Police OP t1_is1b9uq wrote

>I thought having a goal of objectivity was implied when doing research, but maybe I am wrong...

i believe that human objectivity is impossible, as anything written or made by human beings

i, like all human beings am a political, i just want to cut out an overwhelming political narrative i have seen and get as close to objectivity as possible while understanding i can never actually reach it.

−1

How_To_Police OP t1_is169i5 wrote

>Paragraph two: OH MY GOD WHAT THE HELL?!

i just want something that isn't political historical revisionism propaganda? is that so much to ask?

i want something that doesn't have a political agenda behind it, i just want history as it was, not historical revisionism.

−6