Are you crazy?

Don't buy earplugs then, go buy smoke/CO detectors. Right now.

I think that’s a fair statement… I just don’t think it has anything to do with the enforcement of DUI laws.

I don’t understand this comment. Drunk drivers should be allowed because it would be detrimental if they lost access to a vehicle?

https://www.reddit.com/r/boston/comments/1qcj5j/boston_skyline_as_seen_from_the_provincetown/

Interesting related thread, because this picture is from somewhere near 250 feet above ground level, at the top of the Pilgrim Monument.

I think you're missing some modifiers to your calculations. First, he said he's on a boat (likely "doing flips and shit"), so, depending on the size of the whale watching boat, he could be 20/30 feet off the surface of the water.

Also, isn't there a refractory situation with looking to the horizon? I thought I read under the right conditions, even at sea level, you could see buildings 50 miles off.

I mean, do you think this guy is lying?

From the other thread “This was from a whale watching boat exiting the Ptown harbor (probably around Long Point). It was shot with an Olympus em5-II with the 40-150 2.8 + 2x teleconverter.”

You should ask around That’s Entertainment on Park Ave. l would imagine they have some customers that are looking for a game.

The guy you’re replying to.

Break it down for someone not in the know.

How much you looking at there?

He didn't ask about tea. He asked about beef.

So... WHERE'S THE BEEF?!?

This is like the story of the farmer whose son found a horse. It’s possible that the guy in front of the guy in front of you pushed that car into you so he could get out, and the new guy pulled in and left him space.

Which water is that? The Charles?

These are all people. We can work on more than one problem at a time.

You’ve lost me. Have fun.

Oh, you’re totally right, I forgot people only complain about things that make sense.

I’d they did, how many people would have complained about the cost?

So helpful. Is there a useless award?

u/GoblinBags? Why’d you delete your comments coward?

My new house, unfortunately, doesn't get any trick-or-treaters. I'm too spaced out.

I used to live in Auburn, in a spot where lots of trick-or-treaters were in the area, but for sidewalk and traffic reasons, they'd pass by the other side of my street and keep going.

So, I'd put up a display, and lights, and music to try to entice people across the street. I'd also get full size bars from BJs, to build repeat business year to year. I didn't have to buy a ton, because I'd get less than 50 kids.

I like scaring trick-or-treaters.

I think the difference between this and Rittenhouse is that there was a real question for the jury for Rittenhouse.

There is not an iota of question of guilt for this guy.

You don’t understand what intent is, or murder (“first degree intentional homicide” in WI), in a legal sense. He doesn’t have to formulate the intent a half hour before the parade, 20 miles away. He injured something like 70 people and killed 6. Intent can be formulated as the act is occurring. If you choose to ignore barricades and police and PARADE FLOATS and drive full speed through a parade without stopping once, good luck arguing you didn’t have intent to kill.

The shots should be reserved for when one of his objections is successful.

Much less chance of dying.

Every now and then his disdain for having to be in front of a female judge, or being opposed by female prosecutors, peeks through.

I would really like, after the judge reads the jury’s charging instructions, for the judge to then say the jury is dismissed to deliberate, and the foreman saying “No need, your honor. We’re ready.”

He just gave his opening today. You’re talking about something else.

He cried all the way through his opening, and needed time after it to compose himself. The main thrust of his opening was, why is everyone being so mean to me?

Are you saying rights should not be waivable by the party possessing such rights? Your rights should be forced upon you if you don’t want them?

He has the right to remain silent. The right to not testify. Should those be forced upon him?

He’s competent. It’s his choice to defend himself if his attorneys won’t make the stupid arguments he wants to make. That should be his prerogative.