There is definitely discusion among Christians and Jews at least whether Adam and his clone really existed or whether they were the first humans. The Catholics have made a statement saying that the Bible is congruous with evolutionary theory I think. I also recently read a hypothesis from Joshua Swamidas (https://www.amazon.com/Genealogical-Adam-Eve-Surprising-Universal/dp/0830852638) that Adam and his clone could have been created from dirt at the same time as other humans had evolved. This would be done with the divine goal of interbreeding.
I'm not sure how dogmating the Muslim faiths are about Adam and his clone being the first humans, but I think we can potentially take away a whole 1 billion of those that have a more nuanced view of the origin of human life that respects scientific evidence and divine revelation
Homebrewforlife t1_j6hc78k wrote
Reply to 3.8 billion people believe human life started with a Man and His Clone by Acceptable-Shape-528
There is definitely discusion among Christians and Jews at least whether Adam and his clone really existed or whether they were the first humans. The Catholics have made a statement saying that the Bible is congruous with evolutionary theory I think. I also recently read a hypothesis from Joshua Swamidas (https://www.amazon.com/Genealogical-Adam-Eve-Surprising-Universal/dp/0830852638) that Adam and his clone could have been created from dirt at the same time as other humans had evolved. This would be done with the divine goal of interbreeding.
I'm not sure how dogmating the Muslim faiths are about Adam and his clone being the first humans, but I think we can potentially take away a whole 1 billion of those that have a more nuanced view of the origin of human life that respects scientific evidence and divine revelation