Helldozer5000

Helldozer5000 t1_j8fhz7e wrote

I agree the sentence is confusing in a vacuum but it makes perfect sense in context. They're just saying that the people who chose to be vaccinated were already healthier in general so even if those healthy people didn't get vaccinated they still would've fared better than the people who ended up not getting the vaccination because those people were already in worse health.

Nothing super groundbreaking here, we already knew COVID was way worse for people with multiple comorbidities.

82

Helldozer5000 t1_j5r8789 wrote

Same but if you're extending that to parasites then why not viruses and bacteria and what not? At what point does it become an exercise in futility?

I mean I know this is just a virtue signal and you aren't actually donating to charity whenever you take an antibiotic or whatever but it's an interesting logic to probe regardless.

1

Helldozer5000 t1_j5qx5le wrote

>I would destroy the worm because I had to, but I would make a charitable donation in its honor. And someday hopefully make a world where worms and people can live in harmony.

Is this...is this a joke?

A charitable donation in a parasite's honor? Just, why? Which entity would you donate to? Are there organizations that specifically protect parasitic species?

This has to be a joke, right?

1