HaMMeReD
HaMMeReD t1_j4a7i5q wrote
Reply to comment by zaptrem in [D] Is MusicGPT a viable possibility? by markhachman
ah it does say that, and noncommercial license at the top as well.
Doesn't matter much, you can't realistically use it anyways.
The source is there, but I don't think it's a pre-trained model, and it sounds really slow (like a second of audio will be like an hour of processing). It'd probably cost less to commission a real musician.
HaMMeReD t1_j4a6edc wrote
Reply to comment by zaptrem in [D] Is MusicGPT a viable possibility? by markhachman
Not really. Attribution only, no other restrictions.
HaMMeReD t1_j49sktf wrote
Reply to comment by itsnotlupus in [D] Is MusicGPT a viable possibility? by markhachman
Nope, from terms of use regarding ai output.
OpenAI hereby assigns to you all its right, title and interest in and to Output.
Besides, they have commercial apis, paid plans etc. Obviously they endorse commercial use.
HaMMeReD t1_jcnoytz wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Big tech companies are selling their Silicon Valley campuses amid struggle by McFatty7
Yeah, think of the building and the layout. I.e. in apartments, everyone has a bathroom, plumbing etc. In an office, there MAY be one kitchen per floor, a two bathrooms right next to each other, etc. Shared HVAC systems, etc.
Converting it means gutting everything from electrical to plumbing.