Grand_Profession_207
Grand_Profession_207 t1_j6e0003 wrote
Reply to comment by WestBoundExitSign in Soupy Saturday in Westerly by WestBoundExitSign
The best soupy can’t be bought but +1 on Westerly Packing
Grand_Profession_207 t1_j6dzlxv wrote
Reply to comment by HangAnotherBag in Soupy Saturday in Westerly by WestBoundExitSign
My friend’s parents bought a house in Westerly specifically for the “soupy room“
Grand_Profession_207 t1_iz78kc3 wrote
Reply to comment by Nighthawk9997 in RI drivers by [deleted]
Neither a BMW or an Altima, I can assure you haha
Grand_Profession_207 t1_iz784k3 wrote
Reply to comment by Nighthawk9997 in RI drivers by [deleted]
Lol don’t worry man, I got the joke. I just had to vent cause I got walked by 2 Altimas on 95 this morning
Grand_Profession_207 t1_iz6troo wrote
Reply to RI drivers by [deleted]
I know BMW drivers have a bad reputation but I maintain, Nissan Altimas are the most frequent vehicle in my abysmal driver encounters which is made worse by the fact that they’re often not meticulously maintained.
Grand_Profession_207 t1_iw3w319 wrote
Reply to comment by josie-gg in How to get a no motorized bikes sign on bike path? by [deleted]
I can run faster than 11 mph. For much more than a few miles? Probably not, but that’s besides the point.
Grand_Profession_207 t1_itoa094 wrote
Reply to comment by SmiteyMcGee in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
I think the malicious component is satisfied if it’s without the owners permission. E.g AP can’t be claimed on a parcel that one neighbor allows the other to use for grazing cows.
Grand_Profession_207 t1_iti5dlt wrote
Reply to comment by wtfburritoo in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
Paying of taxes isn’t a requirement. I think though that it is a way to build a case for obtaining a property via AP. It’s entirely possible, for a neighbor to think they’re maintaining a piece of property that is their own and paying taxes on it especially when hiring a surveyor is an unnecessary expense for most homeowners.
Grand_Profession_207 t1_iti3w8l wrote
Reply to comment by Jroiiia423 in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
Under the law, possibly
Grand_Profession_207 t1_ith71ee wrote
Reply to comment by Unlikely-Newspaper35 in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
Not a requirement under the RIGL. There’s also this that suggests paying taxes helps prove the case for the squatter
Grand_Profession_207 t1_itgknx7 wrote
Reply to comment by mountedpandahead in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
Not a lawyer but the way the laws surrounding AP sound the sale of property doesn’t reset the clock for either side. Open and Notorious could be as simple as maintaining a garden, it doesn’t necessarily mean building a fence or something. As I said in another comment it’s possible for it to not have been initially malicious it just has to be without permission aka hostile which could be why it wasn’t until the land was surveyed that the discrepancy was noted.
Grand_Profession_207 t1_itfuo5o wrote
Reply to comment by NorwegianSteam in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
It’s unlikely, not impossible but unlikely there’s an easement that didn’t come up during the purchase of the home as it would/should have been incorporated to the zoning maps
Grand_Profession_207 t1_iter1uq wrote
Reply to comment by mdurg68 in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
Getting a survey might not even help unless the purchase was contingent on survey findings being accepted with an affidavit signed by bordering property owners? Not a lawyer btw.
Grand_Profession_207 t1_itejjp0 wrote
Reply to comment by JimmyHavok in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
Yeah, my point was you would think between the two scenarios, the one involving tacking wouldn’t be have been permissible but it was.
Grand_Profession_207 t1_itehb4u wrote
Reply to comment by JimmyHavok in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
Not the case, adverse possession even transfers between owners who assume ownership of a parcel of land I.e “tacking”
Grand_Profession_207 t1_itedikt wrote
Reply to comment by dotts6969 in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
It’s entirely possible the AP of the land wasn’t malicious which could explain why it wasn’t settled with the previous owners and wasn’t until OP had the land surveyed that the boundary discrepancy was realized.
Grand_Profession_207 t1_ite9x8v wrote
Reply to comment by mdurg68 in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
It doesn’t matter if a new owner comes in, in fact “tacking” is allowed where adverse possession is transferable between owners
Grand_Profession_207 t1_ite5lht wrote
Reply to comment by DeliciousScratch3899 in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
This, the idea behind the law is the land has to have been adversely possessed in the first place. If the prior owner ALLOWED him use the land to plant the trees, the criteria for AP is not met.
Grand_Profession_207 t1_ite3r9j wrote
Reply to comment by Vibrant-Nature in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
I said it in another comment, I’m about 100% certain that there’s no requirement for the neighbor to pay taxes on the parcel in question.
Grand_Profession_207 t1_ite36yp wrote
Reply to comment by 4k5 in State Senator stealing my land by Silly_Yak_3741
I don’t think there’s a requirement in the general law for the neighbor to pay taxes on the parcel in question only to have openly maintained it for 10 years.
Grand_Profession_207 t1_ire0l90 wrote
Reply to Fall events this weekend? by Accomplished_Text583
Next weekend but there’s Hop Arts in Hopkinton https://www.hoparts.org/
Grand_Profession_207 OP t1_ir4vcgu wrote
Another one!
Westerly, Rhode Island Surf Co, Surf equipment/Art/Clothes
Submitted by Grand_Profession_207 t3_xw7831 in RhodeIsland
Grand_Profession_207 t1_j6ih3aj wrote
Reply to Looking for a pine forest by Limepink22
Carolina Management Area off Switch Road/Pine Hill Rd in Richmond