GoDucks71
GoDucks71 t1_j6ogwcy wrote
Reply to comment by ItsPennAgain in BABYLON in Three Key Scenes: An interview with Damien Chazelle, Cinematographer Linus Sandgren, and Editor Tom Cross about the movie's portrait of silent and sound filmmaking, and the crazy final montage. by Bullingdon1973
i didn't think that final montage was controversial, just arrogant. To me, it was the director trying to tell us that his movie should be considered a classic, like many of those he included in the montage. For me it put a This Is Not A Great Movie exclamation mark on the proceedings. Of course, we already knew the director thought he had made a classic when we saw that it was going to run over 3 hours. Maybe it would have been better if he had eliminated half the movie....maybe.
GoDucks71 t1_jde1xhk wrote
Reply to I recently saw Blade Runner (1982) and really did not get the appeal. Why is this movie so iconic? by Joseph_Santos_Cruzz
I completely agree with the OP. I never saw the original until just before the newer version and found them to be equally boring. So it may not surprise anyone that I also found 2001 to be boring when I saw it at a drive-in theater during its original run. And still find it that way now. I am not really a fan of big action, but these movies seem to be asleep themselves.