GimmeShockTreatment
GimmeShockTreatment t1_jdno545 wrote
Reply to comment by Cariboudjan in Apple employees face reprisals, possible termination over return to office policy by OutlandishnessOk2452
But these are all future theoretical applications right? Are any of these possible without spending huge amounts of money? My whole point is that current WFH applications work well enough. A company could spend tons of money to get an extra tiny bit of production but I’m not sure there’s evidence that it’s worth it. Making economical decisions doesn’t make someone a dinosaur lol. I work in tech btw so I’m not completely behind the times.
GimmeShockTreatment t1_jdmn7il wrote
Reply to comment by Cariboudjan in Apple employees face reprisals, possible termination over return to office policy by OutlandishnessOk2452
Just explain it to me. I’m happy to learn. I know exactly what AR is by the way. But not seeing what it adds to a work environment at this time.
GimmeShockTreatment t1_jdgkf50 wrote
Reply to comment by Cariboudjan in Apple employees face reprisals, possible termination over return to office policy by OutlandishnessOk2452
Please tell me how AR has WFH applications
GimmeShockTreatment t1_jdo4egs wrote
Reply to comment by Cariboudjan in Apple employees face reprisals, possible termination over return to office policy by OutlandishnessOk2452
No but the cheapest option is to work from home with zoom. It works fairly well. The type of technology you’re suggesting might make sense in niche scenarios but ultimately seems like it has a low cost to benefit ratio.
I can’t speak specifically to the security guard angle of your point. Maybe you’re correct but again that’s niche in the grand scale of jobs that can be WFH.