GayHitIer
GayHitIer t1_j6m1tl8 wrote
Reply to comment by Phoenix5869 in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
The AGI and ASI is much smarter than humans, if there is a way it will find it.
We humans are stupid the ASI will find solutions to anything we can think about.
GayHitIer t1_j6m16z9 wrote
Reply to comment by Phoenix5869 in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
They are experts they are realistic, but climate change killing everyone? Nobody actually thinks that.
Most likely is a boring death to age.
That is why we need to extend our lives.
GayHitIer t1_j6m0jv5 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
Any environmental expert, but you don't name any names how funny.
And yet you don't think AGI and ASI can fix climate change?
Doomerism isn't something new, humans love romanticize the idea of our imminent extinction.
And they have been wrong every time.
GayHitIer t1_j6hrvuk wrote
Reply to comment by motophiliac in ChatGPT creator Sam Altman visits Washington to meet lawmakers | In the meetings, Altman told policymakers that OpenAI is on the path to creating “artificial general intelligence,” by Buck-Nasty
Longievty Escape Velocity, Basically when humans can live indefinitly.
GayHitIer t1_j6eiaym wrote
Reply to comment by Smellz_Of_Elderberry in How rapidly will ai change the biomedical field? What changes can be expected. by Smellz_Of_Elderberry
Don't worry, it will happen sooner than you think most likely.
And even if singularity happens a little later there will still be better medicine.
GayHitIer t1_j6ehbyq wrote
Reply to comment by Smellz_Of_Elderberry in How rapidly will ai change the biomedical field? What changes can be expected. by Smellz_Of_Elderberry
Yeah, nobody really knows what gonna happen soon, but it will be pretty revolutionary.
I'll just sit back and enjoy the show, thank god I got born now to see this.
GayHitIer t1_j6egsbg wrote
Reply to How rapidly will ai change the biomedical field? What changes can be expected. by Smellz_Of_Elderberry
Most prominent research is probably Aubrey De Grey, he says we will reach Longievity Escape Velocity in 2036 with a 50% chance.
Other than that I don't really know technology is advancing too fast for me to give anything of good predictions.
GayHitIer t1_j6ecdbm wrote
GayHitIer t1_j6cs85y wrote
Reply to Will humans rebel against the AI? by Plenty-Side-2902
Rebellion against something billion if not trillion times smarter?
Yeah good luck with that.
GayHitIer t1_j6cg96e wrote
Reply to comment by Lawjarp2 in New York Times [July, 1997] 'Computer needs another century or two to defeat Go champion' LMAOOO this is so hilarious to read looking back by Phoenix5869
Or two 😆
Same with the we will not have planes for thousands of years and then it happens just after that.
We will never use nuclear fuel as power and then it happens just after that.
Never say never.
GayHitIer t1_j6ag7of wrote
And yet you made a post wasting everyone's time including yourself, congratulations you played yourself even harder.
The leave button is free.
GayHitIer t1_j69yran wrote
Reply to comment by questionasker577 in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
Combination of the two. But still s curves.
GayHitIer t1_j69xhbh wrote
Reply to comment by questionasker577 in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
Exponential bigger advancements, AGI will be a huge S curve maybe so big it will just look like a line.
GayHitIer t1_j69ukyk wrote
Reply to comment by questionasker577 in Why did 2003 to 2013 feel like more progress than 2013 to 2023? by questionasker577
Higher s curves.
GayHitIer t1_j69qvvx wrote
S curves, quick progress then maturity and then a new paradigm, we are at the start of a new s curve.
GayHitIer t1_j68tm0l wrote
Reply to comment by kalavala93 in Myth debunked: Myths about nanorobots by kalavala93
They will still be very useful to detect cancer and diseases.
Also never say never, people who use the word never nearly always get proven wrong.
GayHitIer t1_j67v7iq wrote
Reply to comment by Alex_1729 in ⭕ What People Are Missing About Microsoft’s $10B Investment In OpenAI by LesleyFair
I haven't read any of his books, but I have heard ending aging by Aubrey De Grey is pretty good.
And yeah I mean I don't belive in a perfect utopia, but it can get much better than now in my opinion.
I just want to see what happens honestly like a roller-coaster ride I want to see what happens tomorrow.
GayHitIer t1_j65vuf7 wrote
Reply to comment by Alex_1729 in ⭕ What People Are Missing About Microsoft’s $10B Investment In OpenAI by LesleyFair
Aubrey De Grey said LEV could be reached by 2036 with a 50% chance.
Aubrey is probably the most trustworthy guy when it comes to anti age research.
He doesn't sell out or lie about his test results and seems to want the best for humanity. So I trust his prediction.
Yes, cancer will still be a problem, but nanotechnology might solve this down the road.
Though most of our problems could be fixed soon if agi/asi gets made, we will discover new things quicker and quicker.
GayHitIer t1_j65ctte wrote
Reply to comment by Alex_1729 in ⭕ What People Are Missing About Microsoft’s $10B Investment In OpenAI by LesleyFair
Longievity Escape Velocity, basically technological advancements allow us to live more than 100 years.
GayHitIer t1_j64thoi wrote
Reply to opinion: more competition increased the speed of development but will decrease the priority of safety by truthwatcher_
Competition is nearly always beneficial to the consumers also, while I do agree with the safety concerns. This was the best that could happen to speed up the process to AGI/ASI and also the singularity.
GayHitIer t1_j63frod wrote
Everything can kill you in due time.
Rather die a fast death to ASI than slow cancer death or sickness.
Fear mongering the uneducated masses never leaves to something positive
Also who cares it's inevitable being scared of it is stupid.
GayHitIer t1_j63bnmm wrote
Reply to comment by Frumpagumpus in ⭕ What People Are Missing About Microsoft’s $10B Investment In OpenAI by LesleyFair
Still better than baseless, researchless, opinions.
I will take this over twitter quotes from some random nutjob.
GayHitIer t1_j63a03w wrote
Reply to comment by Surur in Teachers pet? How about AI's pet by Ashamed-Asparagus-93
Masochist find this as an absolute win.
Dommy Asi
GayHitIer t1_j638pyn wrote
Reply to comment by _a_a_a_a_a_a_ in ⭕ What People Are Missing About Microsoft’s $10B Investment In OpenAI by LesleyFair
Finance is really important if we want the singularity sooner.
Capitalism is fueling the singularity, without incentive it would take much longer.
GayHitIer t1_j6mgs94 wrote
Reply to comment by Phoenix5869 in I love how the conversation about AI has developed on the sub recently by bachuna
Anthropomorphising the ASI is stupid, sure it may behave like a human, but that is only if we program it that way.