GayHitIer
GayHitIer t1_j5uhqum wrote
The sooner the better, I still think Ray Kurzweil prediction is the most solid one, but who knows really.
GayHitIer t1_j5qpen6 wrote
Reply to comment by just_thisGuy in This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated
Sure the technology will be around there, but for it to change the world as we know, it will take some time for people and politics... don't even get me started with ethics, people will delay this as much as they can sadly.
Doesn't really matter cause LEV will probably also come out around that time to buy us more time.
GayHitIer t1_j5qkj72 wrote
Reply to This subreddit has seen the largest increase of users in the last 2 months, gaining nearly 30k people since the end of November by _dekappatated
People are beggining to realize the singularity is about to happen.
It will most likely occur around 2050-2060, around there this subreddit will skyrocket like the AI's intellience will.
If Moore's law and AI intelligence keep following the graph that is, but it is most likely going to go even faster than what we expect right now.
GayHitIer t1_j5kb7r4 wrote
Read the whole thing, pretty unimpressed with his arguments.
But whatever keeps the future away from luddites works I guess.
GayHitIer t1_j5j9stx wrote
Reply to Want to know if Singularity is coming due to The Law of Accelerating Returns? - I think we can measure it quite easily. by r0cket-b0i
True, we don't know what technology will come tommorow and technology moves the fastest it can.
So predictions will always be off to the pessimistic side than the optimistic.
All we know we could invent a new form for cpu's, which actually happen with atom thick transitores which would allow us to stack it.
Agi and Asi could come way faster than predictions, the problem is that we just don't know what hurdle we have to climb to get there before it happens.
The predictions right now seems pretty realistic with agi being achieved around 2030 to 2040, and asi being achieved soonly after around maybe 2050, after that predictions are off.
GayHitIer t1_j54rgh3 wrote
Reply to comment by Thiccboifentalin in What is easier to create a paradise for one or for all? by Thiccboifentalin
I will give you right in a world that could better than it is right now, though I would like a world where both sides would exist with other people, sure I agree that some people live unfair lives in this world no denying that, but that world is who makes us who we are. Myself have been bullied through my childhood with a poor drug addicted mom who never cared for same with my dad, of course I would have been better off with perfect parents, but that wouldn't be me.
We just have to be careful for what we wish for.
GayHitIer t1_j54mrql wrote
Reply to comment by GayHitIer in What is easier to create a paradise for one or for all? by Thiccboifentalin
I watched Neon Genesis Evangelion where NERV, basically wanted a perfect world where they merged everyone, while it seems like heaven the whole concept is euphemism for suicide.
GayHitIer t1_j54mo16 wrote
Reply to comment by Thiccboifentalin in What is easier to create a paradise for one or for all? by Thiccboifentalin
I just think you can't have good without some bad, a pure hedonistic world would be a euphemism for suicide in my opinion, we exist with good and bad.
We have good days and we have bad days, only having the good is bad.
Doesn't matter social class or who you are, we humans are build upon a world of chaos.
GayHitIer t1_j54mcnz wrote
I don't think pure hedonism is good for anyone.
I would live with others in the real or digital world.
Would get boring to live in a perfect hedonistic world.
GayHitIer t1_j4csvx6 wrote
Reply to comment by imnos in Does anyone else get the feeling that, once true AGI is achieved, most people will act like it was the unsurprising and inevitable outcome that they expected? by oddlyspecificnumber7
I think honestly anything around 2027-2029 seems pretty reasonable.
But it might happen soon.
GayHitIer t1_j4c07n4 wrote
Reply to Does anyone else get the feeling that, once true AGI is achieved, most people will act like it was the unsurprising and inevitable outcome that they expected? by oddlyspecificnumber7
We really don't know, but with the latest results I would think it will happen sooner than later.
Though nobody knows how to reach/make an agi/asi.
My prediction is anywhere from 2023 to 2029.
But it might happen sooner than that.
I hope Ray Kurzweil stands correct.
GayHitIer t1_j485ofu wrote
Reply to comment by Kinexity in Breakthrough milestone in understanding the reversal of aging by duffmanhb
And your argument screams even more insecurity than his.
GayHitIer t1_j485jh1 wrote
Reply to comment by Kinexity in Breakthrough milestone in understanding the reversal of aging by duffmanhb
Average redditor contribution absolutely nothing and calling someone a expert in their field not reliable.
I mean man what are you smoking I want some.
GayHitIer t1_j468eyd wrote
Reply to Should AI receive a salary by flaming_dortos
I don't think it would pursue money, money is a human concept that the AI would deem meaningless.
Though if it wanted money it would own everything. Whatever it wants would probably be out of the human mind.
GayHitIer t1_j3lfgml wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
If we cure as you call age related diseases people would have more lifetime to collect wisdom and become smarter, also we would have more people take responsibility for the climate and the world as of now.
Most people don't care, cause they die before reaping what they sow, with life expansion people would for once actually take accountability for their actions and we might evolve as a species.
I myself will live if possible at least a 1000 years before I would die by own means if possible.
GayHitIer t1_j3lf2mv wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
You seriously have some deep seeded problems, Wasted on the young??? What does that even mean everyone should have access to things fairly, and the only smart people is people who can accept their own stupidity calling others idiots again just make you sound like a clown.
And the whole chafe from the wheat analogy, damn bro that is deep. Everyone deserves access to this nobody should be excluded it will save billions, even the rich will have no reason to keep this to themselves, which is how science should be distributed.
GayHitIer t1_j3le80y wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
Again you reek of arrogance, if anyone is throwing around words they don't understand you would be a fine example.
And I didn't ask you if you would be around in 30 years, even so the Kurz might be a techno Optimist, but he hasn't been off his guess work. What happens in the next decade will be revolutionary we might eliminate biological aging as we know and live healthy and young indefinitely, but ohhhh we don't have it right now means we will never.
Enjoy being ignorant and arrogant, if you really don't care it's your choice I will enjoy being young as long as I can and be open to the future.
GayHitIer t1_j3ld7a4 wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
Aging isn't a disease??? Aging is literally your body dying of multiple diseases while itself eating itself from various cancers.
It's the literal definition of disease in my book, but sure in 20-30 years, if you don't want to stay young and healthy and rather want every imaginable disease and cancer you do you.
GayHitIer t1_j3lct4z wrote
Reply to comment by Trick_Hawk5491 in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
What we know right now doesn't apply to what happens tomorrow or the next decade, making statements about what is possible and impossible has always been stupid, nobody 100% understands what we will achieve after we hit singularity.
GayHitIer t1_j3lc7wl wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
What are you smoking? What I am referring to is the biological age not chronological age, it's already been proven that we can turn the biological clock back in mice by a quite big amount. Sure it will take time, but even the biggest pessimistic would say around 2050 will we reach LEV (Longievity Escape Velocity) Literally the guy with a record in guessing the future with a 86% correct gue sses said around 2030, the truth is that your statement reeks of arrogance we know nothing of what will happen in the next decade.
We will most likely hit the singularity soon which will blow all expectations.
You people will always try to use your logic in things where human logic doesn't totally apply anymore, humans are scared of biological immortality, cause we have a perverse relationship to death literally Stockholm syndrome to the concept of death.
GayHitIer t1_j3lbjjn wrote
Reply to comment by a4mula in Arguments against calling aging a disease make no sense relative to other natural processes we attempt to fix. by Desperate_Food7354
I never get you people, always bashing people for being optimistic about something in our lifetime, the whole natural argument is pure bs, what natural things do we humans do today? Wearing clothes, glasses and going around with smartphones and wide access to the web.
You disregard people because you think it's impossible, which again is a stupid argument.
People said we would never achieve flying and look at us now..
GayHitIer t1_j636jy1 wrote
Reply to ⭕ What People Are Missing About Microsoft’s $10B Investment In OpenAI by LesleyFair
Good post thumbs up :)
Actual researched.