> 10% is easily handled through attrition over the course of one year and without the anxiety leading to wide-spread disruption. I'll never understand how terrible decision makers rise to the highest ranks of leadership.
Well, they've had a hiring freeze for about six months already, so the real target was much higher than 10%. This layoff is on top of half a year of attrition.
GMRealTalk t1_j2zlrw0 wrote
Reply to comment by thought_first in Salesforce to cut staff by 10% in latest tech layoffs by ChocolateTsar
> 10% is easily handled through attrition over the course of one year and without the anxiety leading to wide-spread disruption. I'll never understand how terrible decision makers rise to the highest ranks of leadership.
Well, they've had a hiring freeze for about six months already, so the real target was much higher than 10%. This layoff is on top of half a year of attrition.