FriendofMolly

FriendofMolly t1_j0atebp wrote

What makes the light that enters your eye and the air that enters your ears that of which paints your experience,

Any less of you than the eyes and ears that see and hear…

Second one is a problem not a question but it poses a question.

Try to define a moment before that moment has transferred to the next and if that has happened try to define that moment to yourself or how many moments have passed since the last.

And if you can’t do that and depending on how you answered the first question if all “you” are is one of those or many of those “moments l in time yet your eyes, ears and other faculties do not define you.

Then what and who are you and does a you even exist or is it just as intangible as that moment you tried ti define…

Sorry if I invoked any existential crisis’ but this is a philosophy sub y’all should be able to handle it.

Sorry if some of the grammar is there makes no sense in half asleep and bored Lmao

1

FriendofMolly t1_j0asiem wrote

Within this binding of ever changing but formless infinity if this is heaven then half of everything else is hell and vice versa so who am I to try to put this reality and myself within it “in its place”.

What is the state your at when your asleep but not dreaming. I just call that peace and nothing more. A space in time free from intent, memory, a place without context.

Yet not just that a state where you are at the bare minimum of existing.

And somehow that bare minimum is the embodiment of tranquility and bliss.

So much so that a person is at their most bitter the moments after being awoken from a really deep sleep.

Hence with me knowing that bliss is my underlying state why would I let the bleak “logistics” of the world of the “awake” take me away from what I attain every night and better yet why would I let those “logistics” blind me from that feelings while I’m awake also.

2

FriendofMolly t1_j0arr9l wrote

For me the ones that are great are the ones who have stood the test in time and who’s argument can still be held up as logically sound even after all the knowledge we have gained over the passage of time.

Or in shorter terms the philosophers I see as “great” are the ones who’s wisdom still sits higher than any “knowledge” you hold up next to it.

1

FriendofMolly t1_j0arek3 wrote

Didn’t even have to read what u wrote cuz I undertand and I’m too drunk to read but yes u are correct free will caused the downfall of humanity.

The illusion of free will that was created by mankind’s “ability” to see the pattern of “cause and effect” caused a more defined picture of the “self” to form and the idea that the source of your will comes from this thing called the “self”

2

FriendofMolly t1_itp32uj wrote

So even in our limited view of reality our mathematics has proven infinity.

So since we are clearly in an individual universe of individuality within a reality of the true scope of infinity.

Us as an individual part of infinity revokes the idea of free will in my mind.

We are ghastly unaware of even all the factors that go on within oneself let alone all the external factors of the world that birthed us.

Is jumping up as hard as you can a true attempt at making it to the moon without knowledge of aerodynamics and gravity no it wasn’t a true attempt so the lack of arrival to the moon wasn’t a failure.

Us in this very limited and “relative” expirience and universe express a laughable demonstration of the concept of free will in my opinion

2

FriendofMolly t1_itp2f1f wrote

Not philosophical but more physics inclined but I think I may be able to answer.

For every particle to be arranged in the exact way it were before yes it would literally be that day simple becsuse to do so you would have to reverse the expansion of the universe also so that along with everything being in the exact same place would be turning back the hands of time…

1

FriendofMolly t1_itp27km wrote

A blank canvas is every painting imaginable and not.

A canvas brushed with one stroke of paint is every painting imaginable minus every other one you can’t because of the mark.

No canvas but the air “nothingness” it relies on as a medium is every creation or piece of art that can and can’t be created.

That medium of nothingness is god.

That which spawned infinity.

That which is you.

That which is…

Which is also not…

That’s what I believe god is

That could make sense that could not it’s 3:30 in the morning and I’m stoney baloney lol

And to answer your question no I don’t believe god had quantity or form but within that lack of contains the true infinity of things.

3