Fredissimo666
Fredissimo666 t1_itusug3 wrote
Reply to comment by newbies13 in NASA announces its unidentified aerial phenomena - A 16-people team — including an astronaut, a space-treaty drafter, a boxer, and several astrobiologists — will soon begin its review of unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP) for NASA research team to examine mysterious sightings. by yourSAS
True, and I don't see experts in infared cameras either.
Fredissimo666 t1_itusqxc wrote
Reply to comment by yourSAS in NASA announces its unidentified aerial phenomena - A 16-people team — including an astronaut, a space-treaty drafter, a boxer, and several astrobiologists — will soon begin its review of unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP) for NASA research team to examine mysterious sightings. by yourSAS
It's not a bad panel but not enough expertise in infared cameras and aviation. Like 2-3 people on the most relevant topics. Also, too much expertise in extraterrestrial stuff.
We should expect that most UFOs have earthly explainations. They should be matching images with plane position data first.
Fredissimo666 t1_itc7wfz wrote
Reply to comment by hgs25 in A.I.-Generated Art Is Already Transforming Creative Work by Gari_305
Yes, or other applications where the final art does not matter much. If you are designing a poster for a small conference, you just need something that looks good enough, not necessarily the best.
Fredissimo666 t1_itc7px2 wrote
Reply to comment by elementofpee in A.I.-Generated Art Is Already Transforming Creative Work by Gari_305
It's still to be determined but I think the user should have copyright. After all, Photoshop already has automatic tools and nobody claims that the user loses copyright for using such tools.
In a finished AI image generator software, I expect there to be interractive functions. After you generate the first image, you can ask the AI to do stuff like "make the head funnier", or "keep the characters, but change the background". Then, the creative part very much involves the user as well as the AI.
Fredissimo666 t1_it7xciu wrote
Reply to comment by Gari_305 in A.I.-Generated Art Is Already Transforming Creative Work by Gari_305
Both I think. First, I think AI-generated art will be mostly used in non purely artistic contexts such as poster and ad design. There will always remain a market for human-made art.
For instance, my SO works at a small NGO and often need art for their newsletter. They have been thinking of using AI generated art instead of their previous method (looking for free images on google). Other companies may use AI images instead of hiring artists.
​
But there is an upside for graphical designer and the likes. AI-generated images could make them WAY more productive! Maybe they can get a rough estimate of what they want and then do some manual corrections. Or maybe they get really good at giving the AI the right prompt. Since they are more productive, their rates will drop, so more people will be able to afford graphical design. Imagine having a designer do custom christmas cards for you, or a banner for some event! So in the end, it may be the case that nobody loses their job!
Fredissimo666 t1_je1arck wrote
Reply to eli5 what’s the probability/percentage of winning bingo games? by [deleted]
It depends on the two following factors :
- how many cards you play with vs the total number of cards
- Does only the first person to finish wins or the first few players?
- What do you count as "a game" (one go starting with fresh cards, or a whole evening with several runs)