Fredissimo666

Fredissimo666 t1_itusqxc wrote

It's not a bad panel but not enough expertise in infared cameras and aviation. Like 2-3 people on the most relevant topics. Also, too much expertise in extraterrestrial stuff.

We should expect that most UFOs have earthly explainations. They should be matching images with plane position data first.

0

Fredissimo666 t1_itc7px2 wrote

It's still to be determined but I think the user should have copyright. After all, Photoshop already has automatic tools and nobody claims that the user loses copyright for using such tools.

In a finished AI image generator software, I expect there to be interractive functions. After you generate the first image, you can ask the AI to do stuff like "make the head funnier", or "keep the characters, but change the background". Then, the creative part very much involves the user as well as the AI.

1

Fredissimo666 t1_it7xciu wrote

Both I think. First, I think AI-generated art will be mostly used in non purely artistic contexts such as poster and ad design. There will always remain a market for human-made art.

For instance, my SO works at a small NGO and often need art for their newsletter. They have been thinking of using AI generated art instead of their previous method (looking for free images on google). Other companies may use AI images instead of hiring artists.

​

But there is an upside for graphical designer and the likes. AI-generated images could make them WAY more productive! Maybe they can get a rough estimate of what they want and then do some manual corrections. Or maybe they get really good at giving the AI the right prompt. Since they are more productive, their rates will drop, so more people will be able to afford graphical design. Imagine having a designer do custom christmas cards for you, or a banner for some event! So in the end, it may be the case that nobody loses their job!

17